CSPAN @cspan
·
Rashida Tlaib holds 'War Criminal' sign as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses Congress.
2:41 PM · Jul 24, 2024 //
The Left only destroys
7 hours ago
Actually, that sign is accurate. Rashida Taliban is a genocidal war criminal - or at least wants to be one.
RedinOR The Left only destroys
7 hours ago
Precisely. It wasn't a protest thing, she was self-identifying.
I don’t get it. As far as I can tell, there just isn’t any meaning.
What if you brought along the need for such existential gleaning?
But even I could make that. I think a toddler could’ve made it just as well.
What if some great stories are ones that anyone - everyone - can tell?
So put it on a fridge, perhaps - but not in a museum with an entrance fee.
What if some deep beauties are worth some change to see?
Keep preaching, Socrates; I think I just prefer artists with clearer vision.
What if instead of a statement, the abstract exists as an artist's question?
Sounds clever. But you still haven’t justified to me the admission toll.
What if, though you don't see it, there’s value perceived by some other soul?
Fine, I'll bite; What’s the point? What magic, depth-granting lens do I lack?
There it is, a glimpse of the true art - starting to ask some questions back!
Just tell me what it is you see; what message, meaning, artistic solidarity?
Try Basic Fixes
Uninstall any third-party antivirus program: Third-party antivirus programs can sometimes interfere with the Windows Security app and prevent it from opening on your Windows 11 PC. To avoid any conflicts, it’s best to disable or uninstall any third-party antivirus program.
Install Windows updates: Updates are crucial for any operating system and Windows is no exception. Aside from new features and security patches, these updates also carry important bug fixes. You can download and install any available updates and see if that resolves the issue.
Is your Windows Defender not turning on? Are you looking for full solutions to get rid of this issue? This post will show you how to repair Windows Defender in Windows 11/10/8/7 so your PC can be protected from viruses.
# loop through the indices and print elements
for position in ${!bd_bands[@]};
do
echo "band ${bd_bands[$position]} is at index: $position"
done
In the third part of the Bash Beginner Series, you'll learn to pass arguments to a bash shell script. You'll also learn about special bash shell variables.
Support for Windows 10 will end in October 2025
After October 14, 2025, Microsoft will no longer provide security updates or technical support for Windows 10. Your PC will still work, but we recommend moving to Windows 11.
As RedState reported earlier on Wednesday, the left-wing outlet published an article attacking Republicans for referring to Harris as the nation's "border czar." There was just one problem. Axios published an article in 2021 stating that she was. //
What's the first rule of holes? Something about not digging any further? After getting caught with its pants down, Axios didn't step back and admit it got it wrong. Instead, it added an editor's note throwing itself under the bus for once referring to Harris as the "border czar." In other words, an entire article was written to claim Republicans were lying, and in the end, Axios had to admit it had reported the exact same thing. //
Now that it's become clear she failed miserably at the task, the press wants to take it all back and pretend she holds no real responsibility for the disaster that continues to unfold. Call it Soviet, Orwellian, or worse, it's incredibly creepy to witness the lengths to which supposed "news" outlets are willing to go to protect Harris. This is not how the press is supposed to operate. //
CrankyBoomer.substack.com
an hour ago
I beg to differ.
Since her job as border czar was to do absolutely nothing, from the dems' perspective she succeeded brilliantly.
Ditto Mayorkis brilliantly succeeding at securing the border. They got exactly what they wanted from him too.
Of all the recent trends in automotive technology and design, the adoption of capacitive controls over mechanical switches and buttons—particularly on multifunction steering wheels—is among the most deplorable. One can see the appeal to the designer—slick-looking fiat panels trump dust-attracting seams, for starters. The bean counters love them, too—it takes less time to install the subassemblies, and that means a little more profit per car. It's just that they suck. And now, some Volkswagen drivers say capacitive buttons are to blame for their car crashes.
The woman realized how serious her infection was once she was in custody.
Bebu Silver badge
Windows
I am not too sure...
about the "immortality" of FOSS code.
Looking at the C code in Lions Unix (v6) commentary the code is pretty rough by any standard and certainly when compared with contemporary Linux and BSD code. I imagine in 50 years time that code will look peculiar too.
Long ago having ported quite a lot of open source code between System V and BSD systems (and from VAX/VMS) I can say a lot of it was pretty ghastly and could only be immortal in the sense of a vampire or zombie.
Scientific and Engineering Fortran code, mostly numerical analysis or numerical algorithms does seem immortal. I have had to deal with 40+ year old fortran source which with a bit of compiler tweaking and a couple of (automated) edits compiled cleanly and passed its test suite.
Whether Rust, Go etc etc are still in extended use in 20 years time is probably 10:1 against.
PL/1, Simula67, and even Ada while not gone aren't exactly in common use.
Human perversity will probably ensure people are still hacking away in ISO C42 and using -std=c89 to retain K&R function definitions.
I suppose I could reimplement coreutils in SPARK (Ada). ;)
that one in the corner
but no FOSS package ever dies
Oh yes they do - and have.
Nowadays, the bulk of FOSS is shoved into GitHub and will be available - for as long as GirHub bothers to run its servers[1].
Back in the day, Tarballs and Arc files were downloaded direct from the author's site and then you were expected to mirror it if it was important to you.
Then the Web was "discovered" by more and more people and for some reason the mirroring stopped and changed to just dropping in a link to "the" download location - and of course, we then learnt that URLs have a half-life.
As public version control servers came online - and people started to trust them - we saw materials on something safer than a personal site, or the pages of a company that vanished overnight (sometimes the entire company vanished, sometimes just the project)[2].
If you are lucky, the Internet Archive grabbed a copy and you can try one of the dead URLs there; patience can be required[4].
If you are really lucky, somebody has put a copy into GitHub[5] - although you can open yourself up to flames because your copy "doesn't compile for me"[6]
And what about the FOSS that is practically single-sourced by being published in that JavaScript compost heap? Was LeftPad() also available from GitLab? Some of it is handled properly (p5.js oooh, squiggly and probably safe from vanishing).
Of course, any FOSS that does fall through the cracks "is not important" - after all, all the Linux distros keep their own copies of source packages, "so we are not actually reliant on GitHub at all, Corner you fool."
Not important. Well, you never know. Literally, you never know, it has gone now.[7]
[1] Then we'll have to go back and pull the older version from SourceForge.
[2] As a few others did I like the old "Elegant" library & util from Philips Labs - good luck finding that, on the Philips site - or doing a web search for it available elsewhere[3]
[3] stop giving your projects names that are normal words!
[4] not being able to find something is, in all practical terms, the same as the thing no longer existing at all. Take note when organising your backup copies...
[5] really must put my compiling copy of Elegant up on GitHub
[6] so maybe I won't put Elegant up, as I only have Makefiles for My Own Build System and am fed up telling people how to write build scripts for their favoured build tools. Seriously.
[7] "Important" is a relative term[8]. Maybe it is really important to you to generate an awful lot of Elegantly laid out syntax diagrams in the next day or you can't pay for Tiny Tim's new clutches, he is growing so fast nowadays, at least the one leg is.
[8] see so very many commentards "well, my PC is ok so this is a non-issue" and the response to same
[9] Footnotes FTW. Be more Pterry!
Minimise
Proprietary code goes unpublished – but no FOSS package ever dies. //
Proprietary code goes unpublished: if its host company dies, it probably dies with it the moment the servers are wiped.
Open source's default mode is life. The code is published, cloned, archived by default. It may be abandoned to lie dormant, like a tardigrade sitting out a drought in suspended animation, but drop the water of attention on it and it's back in the game. At least, that's the theory. //
Ledru started the project for very personal reasons: as a director at Mozilla, he was surrounded by Rust creators in an entirely managerial job, and he wanted to learn Rust. Reinventing coreutils, for him, was primarily fun; he learned the thinking behind the beginning of modern computing. Plus, it seemed to be something worth doing.
Last year, the package started to get a reputation for robustness, and was finding its way into production in some significant places. It had attracted hundreds of contributors, it had some performance advantages, and it has a more permissive license – MIT in place of GPL. You can do that if you re-invent. //
The real joy of this is that it's been so organic. One person's itch to learn and code found its salve in a project that few thought needed to be done. But in ten or 20 years' time, it will need to have been done. None of the reasons for this have any place in the proprietary, metrics-driven goal world of closed source.
The end result is that an essential and massively used set of tools from 50 years ago will be just as essential and just as used 50 years hence. To the many freedoms FOSS grants, we can add that of looking ahead as far as you can see and quietly start the business of evolution to fit.
There's a core utility for you. ®
The most comprehensive database for U.S. coins on the internet, and a leading educational resource for buying, selling, and collecting coins.
Sean Cooksey
@SeanJCooksey
·
Follow
House Democrats are now trying to silence me as @FEC Chairman for raising questions about President Biden giving VP Harris all of his campaign cash. All I did was quote federal regulations.
Why are Democrats afraid of the law?
2:40 PM · Jul 23, 2024
The letter has a distinct tone of "Nice little career you have there, Mr. Cooksey. Shame if anything were to... happen to it." //
Mr. Cooksey asks, "Why are Democrats afraid of the law?" I'm not so sure it's that Democrats are afraid of the law; it's just that they view it as something they can ignore when it suits them to do so.
In the video, which runs one minute and twenty-five seconds, a witness in the crowd named Jon Malis was somehow able to keep his wits about him and keep filming even as he realized there was a shooter perched on a rooftop. Eight shots ring out from the attempted assassin, then two more from law enforcement, including the shot that took him out. That kill shot was reportedly fired by a Secret Service sniper. //
The cellphone cameraman, Malis, explained what he saw:
Definitely wasn't secure. I'm actually ex-military. One of the first things I noticed when we walked up, I'm like, we... None of us have been vetted. We're all along the fence. We all have a view of the stage. We could see Trump.
On Tuesday afternoon, Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) shared bodycam footage taken shortly after the incident on his Twitter/X account. Grassley has marked the footage (appropriately) as "Sensitive Content," so I'm including the link to his tweet, along with an embed of the video (below) shared by other accounts on the platform.
In his tweet, Grassley stated:
SENSITIVE CONTENT: July 13 Bodycam footage provides more info than Secret Service will share w America We NEED detailed answers ASAP on security failures TRANSPARENCY BRINGS ACCOUNTABILITYVid obtained from Beaver Co Emergency Services Unit in compliance w congressional requests
While there are many good reasons to vote for Donald Trump and against Kamala Harris, some reasons stand out. So, without further ado, here are ten great reasons to vote against Kamala Harris. //
The Original John Doe Kieran1974
2 hours ago
"Ten Reasons to Vote Against Kamala Harris"
I have twenty relatives who all have one GREAT reason to vote for Harris. They are all dead.
It is possible to push too far and cause voters to recoil. It is not going to be enough to shout "DEI" over and over. Harris has a record, and that record must be meticulously and strategically taken apart for every American to see.
Harmeet K. Dhillon @pnjaban
·
Before y’all get cocky, remember they elected Fetterman 1.0 and Basement Biden. Focus. Shitposting doesn’t turn out the vote. Shoe leather does.
4:03 PM · Jul 23, 2024
Right now, I see a lot of Republicans thinking they can just meme their way to victory. That's far too online of a viewpoint. As I said earlier, I'm all for having fun, but beating Harris is going to take discipline and a well-planned political assault. In the short term, everyone should be prepared for her to start leading in some polls and a total reset of the national narrative. That's not coming from me. That's coming from Trump's own pollster. //
The last big consideration is money. Biden was being strangled by donors. That has now ended with Harris at the top of the ticket. The cash is flowing, and if it hasn't already happened, Democrats are poised to pass up Republicans soon when it comes to total resources on hand. That alone is a major game changer.
Yes, there will be an onslaught of ads, but more importantly, Democrats will now have the money needed to pay volunteers and build ground game infrastructure. Republicans can't just expect to do a few rallies in swing states and drive enough turnout any longer. It's going to take an incredibly well-organized effort to outdo Democrats on the ground. //
eburke GBenton
5 hours ago edited
"Where I think he can hammer her is how she is a liar. She deceived Democrat voters and the country in this and the last election about Biden's fitness to serve."
This...repeatedly. //
GBenton eburke
5 hours ago edited
The Dems weakness is they have been exposed as incompetent liars. It's hard to come back from that.
If Trump can paint Kamala as an incompetent liar who really is over her head, the base instinct for the mass of voters will be for a strong leader because they feel unsafe and insecure about their survival economically and physically.
Kamala will call Trump a criminal, a woman abuser, a fraudster, and a "dictator on day one" who worships Project 2025.
The problem is none of that is true and all but the most BlueAnon dorks know life was better 4 years ago and crime was lower, too.
Kitchen table issues and safety on the streets and in the home trumps woke bullshit and debunked Dem propaganda.
What is Kamala gonna say about Trump that the voters haven't heard and factored in already to the current polling?
Kamala inherits stale and tired talking points and her record is atrocious.
Chinese President Xi Jinping has told the People’s Liberation Army to be ready to conquer Taiwan by the year 2027. Most U.S. military and intelligence analysts believe Xi will attempt such an invasion before this decade is out. Xi views Taiwan’s subjugation under the Chinese Communist Party flag as a requirement of his personal destiny and the party’s political destiny. //
The United States is not obligated, under the current Taiwan Relations Act, to intervene with military forces should the Communist Chinese forces invade the island nation; we are committed to supporting Taiwan with arms and logistical support. But that, in itself, may make the mainland Communists see value in interdicting any such support, which would mean taking military action against U.S. forces in the Pacific.
That could make things in the Pacific downright spicy, and quickly. And China may be preparing to do just that. //
USA_Proud
9 hours ago edited
Their aging demographics alone make military attacks in the next 5 years likely. While their "One Child" policy resulted in a high percentage of Military age Males, it ran for decades, and only ended in 2015. The lack of females in prime child- bearing years makes it difficult to staff a Military. While China may have wanted to wait a few more years to further let Biden decimate our Military while they modernize theirs, fear of a GOP Administration may cause them to jump early. //
Chuck in TX
9 hours ago
China is surrounded by some very strong opponents that would view an attack on one as a likely attack on all of them. Also, Xi has to have serious questions about whether the PLA is as prepared and capable as he has been told. Fatal flaws seem to reveal themselves with the PLA pretty regularly. Any kind of high-tempo operations will reveal even more. Fortress Taiwan undoubtedly has agents within China ready to make life miserable for the CCP and a Three Gorges Dam failure wipes out almost a third of China (from the river to the sea, indeed).
Laocoön of Troy Chuck in TX
7 hours ago
Glad you caught the Three Gorges Dam problem. It really is a war-loser for the People's Republic if it's taken down. The threat of famine over the next coupla years if it goes is all by itself a PRC killer. Their garrisoned waterlogged sandbars in the South China Sea can be made into quicksand with a MOAB...we don't even hafta go nuclear to sink them back into the ocean one at a time.