Again, under the law any death due to measles would be required to be reported to the County Coroner. He has no report.

Given the other apparent deception here it is fair to ask whether the facts of the second case have been materially manipulated similar to the first case, or whether the second case exists at all. //

anon-h5sn
10 hours ago
I guess those 10 plus million illegal aliens who crossed our border unvetted and not vaccinated have nothing to do with the increases in disease cases nationwide. //

anon-8g70
10 hours ago
So....if this country had essentially eliminated measles several years ago, then how do you suppose it was re-introduced to this country? Perhaps through unvaccinated illegals pouring into all parts of the country? Not a great leap to make.

Data centers are often considered as the backbone of the digital world, powering everything from social media to cloud computing.

In this graphic we visualize how many each country has, as of March 2024, using data from Cloudscene (accessed via Statista). //

Countries with the most data centers include the U.S. (45.6% share of total), Germany (4.4%), and the UK (4.4%).

Free, interactive networking tools from Practical Networking.

• CIDR IP .com
  • Interactive CIDR/subnet mask slider that visualizes how CIDR notation affects an IP address in binary and decimal.
• SubnetIPv4.com
  • Randomized subnetting practice problems with auto-fill, auto-check, and a full Subnetting Mastery video series.

• For each Target IP, solve for the Network ID, First Host IP, Last Host IP, Broadcast IP, and Next Network
• To learn how to Subnet watch the Subnetting Mastery free training series listed below

Subnetting Mastery Video Series

This video series will teach you everything you need to know about Subnetting.

To maximize your retention, it is recommended to watch these videos in order, and take a quick practice break after video 4, video 5, and video 7.

Several years ago, a medical missionary wrote to the British medical journal Lancet that an electric shock appeared to have been a successful treatment for a snake-bite. This treatment became popularly advertised for a number of reasons, two being 1) a push from stun-gun manufacturers who believed this would increase sales, and 2) medical missionaries thought that this would be a cheap and effective method of treatment of a not-uncommon problem in third-world countries. Unfortunately, this treatment has not passed a number of laboratory tests. In fact, it can create even greater problems for a victim of venomous snakebite. ////

Majority of criticisms is use of voltage that was acknoledged by Guderian to be much too high (max 20kV)

• Guderian, R.H., C.D. Mackenzie, and J.F. Williams. 1986. High voltage shock treatment for snakebite. Lancet 2:229.
• Kroegel, C., and K.H. Meyer zum Buschenfelde. 1986. Biological basis for high-voltage-shock treatment for snakebite [letter]. Lancet 2(8519): 1335.
• Mueller, L. 1988. A shock cure. Outdoor Life June: 64-65, 110-112.
• Mueller, L. 1988. A shocking cure for snakebite. Outdoor Life ?: 45-47, 76-78.
• Schmutzhard, E. 1986. Electric shocks for snakebite [letter]. Lancet 2(8506): 578.

HIGH VOLTAGE SHOCK TREATMENT FOR SNAKE BITE
Author links open overlay panelRonaldH. Guderian a, CharlesD. Mackenzie b,
JeffreyF. Williams c
a
Hospital Vozandes, Quito, Ecuador, Ecuador
b
Wolfson Tropical Pathology Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdon
c
Department of Microbiology and Public Health, Michigan State University, Michigan, U.S.A.

Volume 328, Issue 8500p229July 26, 1986

Download Full Issue
HIGH VOLTAGE SHOCK TREATMENT FOR SNAKE BITE
RonaldH. Guderiana ∙ CharlesD. Mackenzieb ∙ JeffreyF. Williamsc
Affiliations & Notes
Article Info
Publication History:
Published July 26, 1986
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)92535-3 External Link
Also available on ScienceDirect

Learning Paths
Step-by-step paths to mastery

$40/mo for 6-person family plan

20% off from Veritasium

Fate Is the Hunter is a 1961 memoir by aviation writer Ernest K. Gann. It describes his years working as a pilot from the 1930s to 1950s, starting at American Airlines in Douglas DC-2s and DC-3s when civilian air transport was in its infancy, moving onto wartime flying in C-54s, C-87s, and Lockheed Lodestars, and finally at Matson Navigation's short-lived upstart airline and various post-World War II "nonscheduled" airlines in Douglas DC-4s.

That’s All, Folks!

So my conclusion is that if we’re using the frontierest of all the frontier models (Fable, 5.6-Sol) you can get a passing grade. Barely.

Now granted, if you put a spotlight on me this moment and thrust a microphone into my hand and said “tell me a joke!” I couldn’t do it. But these are supposed to be ASI-threshold models, heralding a new dawn of technological progress. Yet, a nightclub comedian who may have never finished high school can outperform them in this most human metric.

Stick to code, toasters.

Linux dominates the VPS world, and for good reason. Debian, Ubuntu, Alma, and Rocky are everywhere, well-supported, and familiar. (And yes, you can run RedHat Enterprise for free under a dev license if you want to).

Linux has a number of big advantages, but it’s not the only OS on the planet. Besides Windows, there are also the BSDs: Free, Open, and Net. I won’t get into the last two, because honestly if you want to run either of those two, you’re already thoroughly immersed in the BSDverse.

But let’s talk FreeBSD for a moment. Should you run it? There are some pros and cons.

This is the third part in our seven-part series on the BSD series of operating systems.FreeBSD is the most widely-used BSD operating system. It runs on amd64, 64-bit ARM (aarch64), i386, 32-bit ARM (armv6, armv7), RISC-V, and PowerPC. In earlier times, I thought of the three BSDs (DragonFly wasn’t around yet) as “NetBSD = runs on anything, OpenBSD = high security, FreeBSD = awesome on amd64”.

I’ve never been a big NetBSD guy. I played with it a long time ago (like 30 years ago) when I had a 68K Mac and wanted to run a Unix-like OS on it, and NetBSD was the only option. Since then I’ve fooled around with it once or twice, but I just never had a need that OpenBSD or Linux didn’t meet better.

But recently I saw that NetBSD 11 was released, and it included this brag:

New MICROVM kernel for x86, supporting both i386 and amd64, NetBSD 11.0 introduces a dedicated MICROVM kernel designed for extremely fast virtual machine boot, leveraging PVH boot, VirtIO MMIO, and multiple kernel optimizations, it can boot in about 10 ms on 2020-era x86 CPUs.

That certainly sounds cool! My home Proxmox runs on an i5-8250U which is a little earlier than that. It was released in 2017 Q3. So maybe it won’t be quite 10ms, but it should still be pretty fast. //

However, that live image doesn’t use MBR but rather GPT. So you’ll get this if you use the recipe on NetBSD’s MICROVM page.

...

At that point, I entered a ? and it gave a list of potential disk candidates. I don’t know why I remembered that trick of yore…must be some 30-year-old brain cell that didn’t expire when it was supposed to. Well you know what they say, cache expiry is the hardest problem in computer science.

Four guiding stars

• Apps, at a glance
  • Your entire library—pinned, installed, or freshly discovered—should be right there.
• Make it yours
  ** Start should feel like it grew up on your desk, featuring only what and how much you want.
• Accelerate the day
  ** Every pixel must earn its keep, shaving seconds off routine actions so creativity gets a head start.
• Honor the icon
  ** Respect three decades of muscle memory. Update, don’t upend.

Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 were launched in 1977 and are two of a handful of spacecraft that have entered interstellar space. Two others (Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11) were launched several years earlier are now derelict and out of communication with the Earth, while New Horizons is much newer, having been launched in 2006.

The Voyager series have onboard computers that are beyond ancient by modern standards. There are a set of interconnected systems, which combined – combined! – have 32KB of memory. From this, they power an array of scientific instruments and communicate with Earth. They are custom hardware, not off-the-shelf electronics, and hold the world records for the oldest continuously-running computers, having been powered-on nonstop since 1977. The CPUs operate at about 250Khz, which is four times slower than a Commodore 64.

There isn’t really an operating system per se, but rather a set of different integrated circuits to do specific things. The design is more like a constellation of Arduino boards than a Raspberry Pi.

One interesting thing is that there’s no encryption or authentication per se.

this is a complete example / quickstart for running copyparty on windows, optionally as a service (autostart on boot)

Cthel Ars Praefectus
6y
11,052
Subscriptor
odikweos said:
Wow. Not even one commenter mentioned the possibility of Chinese competition.

The real story here is exactly when cheap Chinese competition completely erodes the global demand for American launch. It's happened in industry after industry, and the state-owned "company" that handles the matter for PRC just succeeded at its first retrieval last month.

And no one apparently even has this on their radar.
That's because the US outlawed launching anything containing a single US-made component (including software) on a Chinese launch vehicle.
https://spacenews.com/u-s-itar-satellite-export-regimes-effects-still-strong-in-europe/

Massive fines tend to make the business model for launching on a Chinese launch vehicle unviable. //

Mdoug1974 Smack-Fu Master, in training
1y
18
The one and only reason SpaceX holds a monopoly as Gwynne Shotwell has stated many manby times is that all the other launch service providers have failed to provide any competition.

SpaceX cannot be blamed for its competitors failures to bring rockets to market in sufficient numbers to make a challenge.
Shotwell has in so many interviews stated that SpaceX welcoms competition because it will force them to work harder, better and smarter.
Nobody has been even able to start being competion yet. and by the time they do starship will be flying, and maybe Falcon 9 will be slowing down.

SpaceX have to fly F9 until the ISS is shutdown as they are contracted to do so, and starship willnever be cleared to ISS unless somebody(Boeing) re-calculates all the stress and mechanical loading of attaching a fully finished Starship to the ISS.

The company that is almost exclusively responsible for the dramatic increase in launch availability in the 2020s has signaled that it intends to wind down Falcon 9 operations as quickly as possible in favor of the larger Starship rocket. Some might see that as a good thing due to Starship’s enormous payload capacity. But there are growing concerns that SpaceX will largely focus on its own payloads—Starlink v3 satellites and orbital data centers—because of their potential to drive far greater profits. The Starship rocket’s PEZ satellite dispenser, optimized for Starlink, is an indication of the company’s priorities.

In financial documents, it’s clear that SpaceX views commercial launch as a rounding error compared to revenues from its own satellites in space. A majority of the company’s revenue ($4.3 billion out of $7.8 billion) during the second quarter of 2026 came from Starlink, whereas less than 12 percent was due to space services, of which commercial launch is but a fraction. This disparity is only likely to widen.

SpaceX has already moved beyond “peak” Falcon 9 operations. The company flew the rocket 165 times last year, and it will probably fly about 20 fewer missions this year. SpaceX is already making ground system changes to reflect these reductions. //

Whether or not these dates stick, it has become clear to commercial satellite operators that they can no longer reliably plan their future around the workhorse Falcon 9 rocket, creating a huge pain point for the commercial space industry in the United States and other Western countries.

This is because of an inescapable reality: Without SpaceX, the Western launch market would have been completely screwed over the last half-decade. //

The Ariane 6 rocket made its debut flight in July 2024 and has had a nice track record. But with a production goal of ten vehicles a year, the rocket won’t make a meaningful dent in the global need for launch capacity.

Lately though, one issue that has become increasingly troublesome is the use of the word “provider” as a blanket term to cover any professional who provides healthcare. I did not go to provider school, but rather medical school, followed by 4 years of psychiatric training before starting my own practice back in 1993. I am and will remain a doctor, NOT a provider. Recently, I spoke with a friend of mine who works as an attorney for an insurance company in their contracts department. She explained that insurers use the word provider in their language as a short cut. Ok, I can see that, but the problem runs so much deeper reducing the word count in a contract.

In her MommyDoc blog, Dr. Niran Al-Agba, a pediatrician in the state of Washington writes:

“Provider” was first utilized by The Third Reich, who embraced this moniker to degrade Jewish physicians as medical professionals. The historic root and use of the word “provider” deserves our attention and reflection because if we forget the tragic mistakes of history, we may be doomed to repeat them. While the more recent movement to disrespect the education and training of physicians was the brainchild of the federal government and corporatized medicine, this disdain for medical expertise has occurred before–to Jewish physicians living in Germany in 1937, before World War II. (https://peds-mommydoc.blogspot.com/2019/02/if-you-call-me-provider-i-will-assume.html)

In their article “Promoting Trust and Morale by Changing How the Word Provider Is Used,” JAMA. 2021;325(23):2343-2344 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34047757/, John W. Beasley, MD1; Richard G. Roberts, MD, JD1; Allan H. Goroll, MD2 write:

Use of the term provider in health care originated in government and insurance sectors to designate health care delivery organizations. In 1965, Medicare began using provider for entities qualifying to receive Medicare reimbursement.1 Over the years, the use of the term has expanded to include an ever-enlarging set of individual health care professionals who qualify for payment, especially those in primary care, in addition to institutions (eg, hospitals, clinics, treatment centers) and third-party payers. As such, the term has become part of everyday language in health care delivery, for example, the popular use of the phrase primary care provider. While convenient and a source of pride for some, such use also poses risk for unintentional and potentially detrimental consequences.

I don’t equate insurance companies with Nazis, hate crimes, or the persecution of anyone considered “other.” Instead I aim to draw a line connecting the past and present and highlight the more sinister undertones of the term provider. As doctors we are being diluted and marginalized by the influx of less trained “providers.” Our field is being squeezed more and more by profit driven insurance companies, health care administration “systems,” hedge funds and private equity firms. If “provider” stands for any health care professional, where is the distinction?

AutoCAD Foundations helps you gain the knowledge you need to understand essential features and workflows. With these foundational skills, you can use AutoCAD to create architectural, mechanical, civil engineering, and other types of designs.