Trump officials are fleeing their homes in the face of left-wing threats, but The Atlantic says the problem is actually Trump’s rhetoric.
"If the courts are going to have so much influence over US policy, do you wish you would have just become a judge?"
Trump: "We had millions of criminals pour into our country. And if we don't get them out and get them out quickly, you could lose your country very easily." pic.twitter.com/UfA7egQLi8
— TheBlaze (@theblaze) May 30, 2025. //
ELON MUSK: "I think the fundamental moral flaw of the left is empathy for the criminals and not empathy for the victims — empathy for the criminals but not empathy for the victims. And there's been way too much of that; that needs to stop. To the president's point, there's been immense judicial overreach that is unconstitutional — that was never intended — and it's undermining the people's faith in the legal system. It needs to stop. It's gone too far.
pic.twitter.com/JY1IomtX60
— Autism Capital 🧩 (@AutismCapital) May 30, 2025. //
stickdude90
5 minutes ago
During Trump 1.0 (and arguably long before then), the media threw away their credibility in favor of ideology.
During the pandemic, the public health institutions threw away their credibility in favor of ideology.
The judiciary is bound and determined to follow that path, and they're doing a bang-up job so far.
Eric Daugherty
@EricLDaugh
·
Follow
🚨 TRUMP FAKE NEWS SMACKDOWN: He has to explain Art of the Deal over and over again!
REPORTER: People say, 'Trump always chickens out on his tariffs.'
TRUMP: "You ask a nasty question like that? It's called NEGOTIATION."
"Don't ever say what you said. That's a NASTY question." Show more
Last edited
12:41 PM · May 28, 2025
The term “TACO trade,” or “Trump Always Chickens Out" on tariffs, was coined by Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong in a May article. Other liberals and folks like the TDS-addled Lincoln Project weirdos have been trying to mock Trump with variations of it since: //
Ashram, the Black Knight
2 hours ago edited
If you consider Trump's criticism of your question a "badge of honor," then that just confirms your bias and your tendency to never give the current administration a fair shake, Casella.
You should have your press credentials pulled.
This is the status of our press corps today. They need to come out and refute the words of Donald Trump, at all costs – even if those refutations support inhuman activity, contradict their own reporting, and the cost is their own credibility.
Which is more plausible: the lying media has suddenly discovered accurate polling data? Or Trump supporters are not being polled?
what is particularly revealing is how some parts of the Department of Justice see themselves as an independent branch of government.
Traditionally, all of the lawyers in the office except two — the solicitor general and the principal deputy — are nonpartisan career employees who span administrations, rather than political appointees. When the office takes legal positions, it has historically taken a long view about what is best for the U.S. government.
The hubris in this statement is simply breathtaking. No one in the federal bureaucracy has the remit of taking "a long view about what is best for the U.S. government." That is a political, not a professional judgment. It implies that unelected bureaucrats are supposed to act as a brake, or even an anchor or land mine, to keep an administration from going in a direction it doesn't like. That is wrong, and it is the essence of the Third World style Deep State that President Trump railed against during his first term. //
Those people said the exodus raises questions about whether the department will be able to recruit attorneys from top law schools with clerkship experience and diverse backgrounds at a time when the administration is rapidly filing emergency requests at the high court.
Again, this is an example of the Deep State inadvertently revealing itself. If the Department of Justice values those things and thinks it will not be able to find them if it loyally serves the president, it is making a strong case that its offices are both partisan and elitist. //
Fortunately, the Trump administration is rising to the challenge of finding lawyers who are willing to work to further the Trump agenda.
The Justice Department is building a roster of lawyers willing to defend in court the most controversial parts of President Donald Trump’s agenda, firing career attorneys whom leaders view as standing in their way and hiring dozens of political appointees to carry out the president’s agenda.
The new hires are already appearing on behalf of the government to defend Trump’s efforts to remake immigration policy and the federal workforce and to expand the powers of the presidency. They sometimes sit in front of judges alone, without the cadre of veteran attorneys who typically show up for big cases.
Some have prestigious conservative credentials, clerking for Supreme Court justices and top federal judges, according to a review of the new hires’ professional bios posted on LinkedIn. Others are fresh out of law school, taking on influential positions. Many honed their legal skills working for conservative state attorneys general during the Biden administration. //
Battles like these are happening across the federal government: in the Department of Health and Human Services, at the Environmental Protection Agency, and even in the Armed Forces; see Top US Commander in Greenland Disavows Trump's Position to US and Danish Troops (Updated). The idea that only long-serving, ideologically driven elite law school graduates can adequately represent the United States in court is ridiculous, and you need only look at past performance for the proof. //
GBenton 2 hours ago
Unhappy with the limits our republic as founded placed on the left's demonic lust for power, they spent the last 100 years growing the administrative state outside the bounds and through lawfare and dumbing down the voters with public education, they tried to subjugate and enslave us from within without firing a shot.
Appeals to the norms are simply an attempt to get us to accept our serfdom and not ask of district judges can usurp Article II powers or of the IA can run color revolutions and even delete presidents like JFK or railroad them out like Nixon amd Trump.
its all smoke and mirrors. This extra constitutional adventure needs to come to an end or we lose the country.
McCarthy was right. The commies are burrowed in everywhere, playing the long game.
Time to tear out what they corrupted over the last century and reform education so they can't easily rebuild it.
From inauguration day onward, the military services have engaged in a campaign of "malicious compliance," that is, aggressively applying administration directives in a way that makes the directives and the people issuing them look ridiculous. I've listed a few of those instances below: //
I can't imagine Colonel Meyers being in command much longer. She was under no moral, legal, or ethical obligation to defend Vance's remarks, but she was under an obligation not to comment negatively on them. Not only did she do so to all base personnel, an action that more likely than not violated Article 88 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. When he included Danish military personnel on the email distribution list, she definitely crossed a line that should cost her her commission.
Kernen: “Did you call for Lloyd Austin’s resignation? Not only did we lose 13 service members, we left $70 billion worth of equipment that fell into the hands of the Taliban.”
“Couple of years later, he was out of pocket for two weeks and didn’t tell the White House. Did you ask for him to resign at this point?”
Coons: “The fact the Secretary of Defense was getting healthcare is fundamentally different from the Secretary of Defense sharing on an unsecured platform attack plans.”
Kernen: “The point is you’re going to complain about a splinter in one eye and ignore a 2x4 in the other eye.”
jester6
6 hours ago
The Legacy Media Bubble is like a commemorative snowglobe. Those of us outside know the snow is fake and the buildings aren't real. Those living inside think those buildings are their whole world and they are facing an apocalyptic blizzard.
Keep shaking that globe, Donald.
These people took oaths. They have — or had — security clearances, with the extensive background checks that go with those. I know — I've undergone a background check for a top-secret clearance myself. And, depending on which foreign government these disgruntled ex-employees might choose to go to, this act would be, arguably, treason.
Treason, I should note, is specifically called out in the Constitution. Article III, Section 3, Clause 1: //
If this were to happen, it would be troubling indeed; an indication that the rot in the federal government is far worse, runs far deeper, and is far more pervasive than we thought. The very idea that someone placed in a position of great trust, with insights into matters of national security, with access to highly classified materials, wou
Representative Mike Waltz, President Trump's choice to lead the National Security Council, said in an interview published Thursday that all current civil service members of the NSC who are detailed from another agency are expected to be out of the building as soon as Trump is sworn in.
“Everybody is going to resign at 12:01 on January 20,” Waltz said. “We’re working through our process to get everybody their clearances and through the transition process now. Our folks know who we want out in the agencies, we’re putting those requests in, and in terms of the detailees they’re all going to go back.”
What Waltz, a retired Special Forces colonel, is reacting to is the obstruction and leaks from the NSC staff on loan from other agencies that damaged Trump's agenda in his first term. He plans to get rid of people who may have made a career as part of the "interagency process" and have more loyalty to that process than they do to Trump. //
Alexander S. Vindman 🇺🇸
@AVindman
·
Follow
Statement on National Security Staff Firings
Yesterday, President Trump’s National Security Advisor, Mike Waltz @michaelgwaltz , announced a sweeping directive to terminate all national security staffers loaned from other departments and agencies who serve in apolitical,… Show more
2:34 PM · Jan 10, 2025 //
Nah, you were fired for leaking a privileged conversation to a co-conspirator who then had himself labeled a "whistleblower" to create a fake fact case for impeaching President Trump. And also for being a treasonous oxygen thief. //
There is an admitted danger in groupthink. We can see that in the way the Biden NSC has coddled Iran, China, and Russia in the misguided view that in some bizarro universe, they would become useful members of the international community. Dissent doesn't need to be hashed out at the staff level. Also, I don't think anyone in the Trump administration is interested in "continuity of policy" with Biden because his foreign policy failures, both active and in terms of missed opportunities, are the stuff of legend. //
You have to admire how Vindman categorizes himself as a "talented professional" who was dismissed for taking "principled stances or offering objective advice." Actually, the role of making policy in civil service is the realm of political appointees. The career staff are supposed to serve every president loyally. The last thing needed in the NSC are staffers who are first and foremost loyal to "the way we've always done it," who are overly concerned about the agency "equities" at stake when decisions are made, and who see themselves as players in policy in their own right. //
John Q. Public
3 minutes ago
LOL at the tags…
Douchenozzle is correct.
Also, when he says, “tens of thousands of senior apolitical government officials” he is unintentionally letting slip how many actually need to be fired.
American Leftists have lied about President Trump and his supporters for so long that they are utterly bereft. How will they make it through the new year? Will they proceed through the steps of grief and finally accept that they were in error and outside the bounds of rationality or will they get stuck in anger—the second stage of grief?1
For some the stage of bargaining has begun already. They are insisting that we, Trump and the MAGA movement, we who insist on the precepts of the Constitution and rule of law, treat our Leftists better than they ever treated Trump or us.
Remember how they projected their anti-American rage on all conservatives? //
The anti-American Leftists want us to forget about their crimes and misdeeds, such as labeling the events of January 6, 2021, an insurrection, led by President Trump. Odd, isn’t it, that no one has been charged or convicted of insurrection in the Department of Justice’s largest manhunt in history.
Trump, whom the anti-American Left and its media gang continue to label an insurrectionist, was the one who had the National Guard standby to help keep the peace on January 6. But D.C. Mayor Bowser and Capitol Police and then-Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, specifically indicated that they did not want the National Guard at the Capitol or the Mall. Who called for peace? President Trump. Who was more concerned about the optics? The anti-American Leftists, of whom Pelosi is one. //
But for political equilibrium to be restored in America, those who have done wrong, who have violated the law (i.e., the Congressional J6 Committee that suborned perjury, doctored evidence, and suppressed exculpatory evidence), must be held accountable. That is the only way to restore the rule of law.
In order to have freedom, you must have the rule of law. The rule of law prevents bullies from overwhelming the weak. It preserves equal treatment before the law.
And, if the anti-American Left is grieving because of the electoral beating that they took in November, it might be possible that there is some residual desire for justice on the Right.
Accountability might just help the anti-American Left finally come to acceptance, the final stage of grief.
The liberal-left reaps what it sows. It was not merely Trump that was chosen. It was the not-Democrat, the option that wasn’t in power. A vote is a middle finger aimed to the sky. In the heat of all this, the liberal-left will have to recalibrate or dissolve. Radical chic is fading. The Hitler analogies are played out. So are the speech wars. They will have to, somehow, consider material conditions. This is never easy if you’ve never lived anything close to a precarious life. Harder, still, if you’ve allowed condescension and indignation to become the pillars of a worldview. The smug never inherit the Earth. If only the Bible printed this, or someone took it to cable television in time. Much grief could have been saved.
The smug never inherit the Earth.
Tyrus reposted
Sebastian Gorka DrG
@SebGorka
.
@PlanetTyrus
tells a story about the REAL
@realDonaldTrump
Embedded video //
XCiles @xc_iles
·
Oct 20
Either this is all fraudulent, or the media - Left, but also the more bellicose Right, at times - are so rutted in the narrative that Trump is the worst human alive that his complexity, humanity and, yes, goodness get squeezed out. We need much more on this.
Last week, Fox News contributor Tyrus sat down with Donald Trump for an exclusive interview for the latest episode of Maintaing With Tyrus on OutKick. The conversation focused on manhood, religion, schools, surviving an assassination attempt and also delved into who Trump is as a person.
A reader contacted OutKick to alert us that when they tried to share the YouTube link of the interview on Facebook, they were unable to do so and instead received a message stating the following: "Your content couldn't be shared because this goes against our Community Standards."
In response, we tried to share the video ourselves and were met with the same notification (see below). OutKick heard from dozens of people across America who had the same experience. //
The Trump-Tyrus interview wasn't the only video that people had trouble sharing. After the initial issue was pointed out, we tried to post Clay Travis' interview with Donald Trump from the Alabama-Georgia game earlier this month. The link to that interview was also blocked from sharing on Facebook and supposedly violated the same "Community Standards" as the Tyrus interview.
Gold Star families and former White House officials are slamming Jeffrey Goldberg’s attempt to smear Trump with another fallacious hit piece. //
Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of far-left propaganda outlet The Atlantic, published an article Tuesday with glaring fabrications about former President Donald Trump’s interactions with the families of fallen service members and his outlook on military leadership.
Goldberg’s dishonest hit piece is the latest in a long line of far-left outlets lying and deceiving the American people before a major election. //
While Goldberg’s claims are sourced by “contemporaneous notes” and “a witness,” they were disputed publicly by senior members of the Trump administration who were actually in the room at the time of the alleged incident. //
Goldberg’s smear piece is in line with his 2020 lie, the “suckers and loser” hoax that was also heavily rebutted by nearly everyone involved, which he originated late in the election season as well. Conveniently, Democrats have since been rolling that hoax out every time Trump mentions the military, as they did again in the aftermath of Trump attending the Arlington National Cemetery ceremony.
As my colleague Jordan Boyd wrote, “Nearly two dozen Trump White House officials debunked the hit piece, which only received ‘confirmation’ from one source outside of Goldberg.” In the same way, Goldberg’s newest screed is thinly sourced and relies on anonymous testimony while ignoring or devaluing on-the-record statements.
Goldberg also appears to have invented out of thin air a denial from Meadows spokesman Ben Williamson, saying that Meadows “denied having heard Trump make the statement.” In reality, Meadows said Trump “absolutely did not say that.”
Ben Williamson @_WilliamsonBen
·
On the left: I sent Atlantic a comment saying President Trump “absolutely did not say that,” referring to the alleged comments about Ms. Guillen they printed.
On the right: Atlantic translated that comment to “didn’t hear Trump say it.”
Treat this dishonest piece accordingly.
6:07 PM · Oct 22, 2024
Jeffrey Goldberg published a bombshell story that convulsed the nation. No, I’m not talking about his recent Atlantic magazine piece claiming, based on the testimony of four anonymous sources, that President Trump had grossly disrespected America’s dead and wounded warriors in 2018.
I’m talking about Goldberg’s New Yorker feature claiming that “the relationship between Saddam’s regime and al-Qaeda is far closer than previously thought.” Published less than a year after 9/11, the story fed into the fervid pro-war atmosphere that then gripped the nation.
Headlined “The Great Terror,” the essay was based on a reporting trip to Iraq’s northern Kurdish zone. It recounted, in terrifying and admirable detail, Saddam Hussein’s 1988 poison-gas assault against Kurdish civilians in the village of Halabja.
Along the way, Goldberg did other things, too — chief among them, speaking to alleged terrorist detainees in a prison run by a pro-regime-change Kurdish faction.
The mostly unnamed prisoners, per Goldberg, informed him “that the intelligence service of Saddam Hussein has joint control, with al-Qaeda operatives, over [a local jihadist faction]; that Saddam Hussein hosted a senior leader of al-Qaeda in Baghdad in 1992; that a number of al-Qaeda members fleeing Afghanistan have been secretly brought into territory controlled by [the local jihadists]; and that Iraqi intelligence agents smuggled conventional weapons, and possibly even chemical and biological weapons, into Afghanistan.” //
Pretty chilling stuff. The Bush administration made Saddam’s ties to al-Qaeda a key plank of its case for regime change. The war happened. Saddam was toppled. But in the years that followed, the Iraq-al-Qaeda link posited by Goldberg unraveled.
Attorney Natalie Khawam @WhistleblowerLF
·
After having dealt with hundreds of reporters in my legal career, this is unfortunately the first time I have to go on record and call out Jeffrey Goldberg@the Atlantic: not only did he misrepresent our conversation but he outright LIED in HIS sensational story.
More… Show more
The Atlantic @TheAtlantic
“I need the kind of generals that Hitler had”: Trump’s obsession with dictators and disdain for America’s military are deepening, @JeffreyGoldberg reports: https://theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/10/trump-military-generals-hitler/680327/?taid=6717ffe956474d000110c05d&utm_campaign=the-atlantic&utm_content=true-anthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
7:13 PM · Oct 22, 2024. //
Mark Meadows
@MarkMeadows
·
Follow
I was in the discussions featured in the Atlantic’s latest hit piece against President Trump. Let me say this.
Any suggestion that President Trump disparaged Ms. Guillen or refused to pay for her funeral expenses is absolutely false.
He was nothing but kind, gracious, and… Show more
4:42 PM · Oct 22, 2024 //
This calls to mind Goldberg's infamous fable, when he told his readers in a Sept. 3, 2020, piece, “Trump: Americans Who Died in War Are ‘Losers’ and ‘Suckers’” that Trump ridiculed fallen warriors when the decision was made not to visit the Belleau Wood military cemetery in France during the centennial commemoration of the end of World War I.
A senior Army officer traveling with the president that day told RedState the trip to Belleau Wood, which is sacred to the Marines, was scrubbed because the foul weather grounded the helicopters.
Without helicopters, the president and his entourage would be a slow-moving motorcade on country roads for 45 minutes, a target too rich to provide to an adversary—coupled with the fact that without helicopters, there could be no medevac by air if something happened.
At the center of this controversy is Klippenstein’s decision to release the Trump campaign’s vetting documents on Vance, which included the senator’s personal information, including emails, phone numbers, and addresses. The documents were obtained by hackers on behalf of the Islamic Republic of Iran, which means there's a possibility that Klippenstein may be (purposely or accidentally) doing Tehran’s bidding for political purposes.
In response, X suspended Klippenstein’s account, which has angered folks on the left. They argue that this decision is hypocritical. They also claim folks on the right who support the move are also being hypocritical because of their opposition to the platform’s decision to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story. //
What these folks are missing – or deliberately leaving out – is that X adopted a policy in March that disallows “doxxing,” which occurs when someone exposes personal information without the person’s consent: //
Under the previous management, the laptop story was suppressed for a different reason: The company claimed it was information that was hacked by Russians. This contention was later exposed as one in a long list of left-wing hoaxes.
What is also interesting about this story is that the doxxing of Vance was done using information coming from Iranian hackers, which clearly violates the platform’s rules. //
Mooslim&squirrel
13 hours ago
Dear Molly Stupid, Hunter Biden’s laptop wasn’t stolen. Wasn’t released by foreign actors and you are still lying about it. So there is that //
John Q. Public
13 hours ago
They seem to ignore the fact that Hunter willingly gave up the laptop and its contents, despite being contacted on multiple occasions to pick it up. It was not “stolen” or “hacked”. //
oldgimpy&cranky
13 hours ago
I continue to see leftists pretend to not understand that "hacking" into someone's personal accounts means [at the least] electronic B&E. Meanwhile, when you ABANDON your laptop and its drives full of info - you have literally given it away.
I can forgive the senile commies that never learned cp/m, but there is no way on earth the younger commies don't know the difference.
And, we've been over the whole DOXXING mess ad nauseam. It's not complicated. (and no, if we publish your OFFICE address and numbers and titles, found on your company site, it's not Doxxing). //
Cafeblue32
23 minutes ago
He should be banned for having the last name Klippenstein. I can't hardly read it without laughing. Sounds like a 1930s monster movie. Run! It's the Klippenstein monster!
That's the thing with the left. Everything they want is a Dollar Store moral equivalent of something decent and good.
Nature miscarries babies, so abortion is not wrong. (Intent of the mother is ignored)
A male athlete gussied up as a woman takes estrogen, so he doesn't have an advantage. (physical reality is ignored)
If abortion is wrong, so is the death penalty. (guilt or innocence of the one being killed is ignored)
A current day border crosser here is the same as a refugee from civil warin Africa or Asia. ( the fact none of our southern neighbors are at war is ignored)
Israeli apartheid is no different than South Africa's. (The role the two major world religions involved and who is the aggressor are ignored).
Etc.
now Biden-Harris Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo seems to have doubled down on the incendiary language in a particularly vile comment.
Doocy had asked them how many assassination attempts it was going to take before they stopped calling Trump a "threat." He was trying to get them to dial things back. Well, the word Raimondo picked was far worse. She said, "Let's extinguish him for good."
Trump War Room @TrumpWarRoom
·
Harris-Biden Commerce Secretary @GinaRaimondo calls for President Trump to be "extinguished for good."
Ten days ago, a deranged Harris supporter tried to assassinate President Trump.
Yet, Democrat lunatics continue to spew this dangerous rhetoric.
9:24 AM · Sep 25, 2024
Yikes. These people have no conscience or sense at all. How does she think that reads to a crazy leftist? But they don't care, all they care about is running him under and winning. They will say or do anything.
This has to stop. Members of Congress and all responsible people need to condemn this. //
This is the same person who beclowned herself when she was asked about the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) having to correct the false information they had put out about 800,000 jobs being created.
RNC Research @RNCResearch
·
Harris-Biden Commerce Sec. Gina Raimondo says she doesn't believe new government data that shows almost a million of the jobs the Harris-Biden admin claimed to have "created" don't actually exist.
"I'm not familiar with that."
5:44 PM · Aug 21, 2024
She tried to attack Trump, but then was told it was a BLS correction, to which she responded, "I'm not familiar with that."