Williams has not ruled on any of the underlying claims. What she has done is hand a win to a group founded by one of Trump's impeachment lawyers, who filed a motion with a judge appointed by Barack Obama and got exactly the result they were looking for. //
Tech in RL
3 hours ago
Sure, re-open the case and press forward for $10 billion. Trump is in a no-lose situation. He either wins a huge award for weaponization of government because guilt is certain since a guy went to jail for it, or the people get a weaponization fund. If Trump wins a big award from this, he can set up his own fund without worrying about politics. //
Old Texan
2 hours ago edited
"whether the case should be reopened because "the court was the victim of a fraud"
Perhaps she should review the thousands of cases filed against everything Trump does, and then let me know if the judiciary is not committing fraud on a regular basis. Perhaps then I will give credence to her concerns. //
anon-isiz
2 hours ago
What are the 35 judges’ standing to question the settlement? None.
District9 anon-isiz
30 minutes ago
Democrat challengers automatically have standing everywhere. Standing only comes into play when Republicans question something.
