One would think that removing noncitizens from your voting rolls would be a smart thing to do to ensure a fair election in November—but the Harris-Biden Department of Justice evidently disagrees.

They’re suing the state of Virginia on technical grounds—it’s too close to the election for such procedures, they say. //

DKnight
an hour ago edited
The “quiet period” makes no sense from a legal or moral standpoint. All it does is announce to the public that people who are ineligible to vote can slide in under the radar as long as they do their registration inside that 90 day period. This same DOJ demands states also allow same day registration is limiting their ability to correct any ineligible registrations.

Imagine what would happen if the Feds announced that between 3 am and 6 am, cops are not allowed to be patrolling the streets and no crimes would be investigated. What do you suppose will happen?

It's honestly hilarious how much some of this language mirrors the things Republicans have been lambasted for in the past. Anytime a GOP politician even suggests that they will only certify the results if the election is "fair," they are piledriven by the press as promoting "insurrection." Yet, when Democrats do the same thing, the mainstream journalists give a collective shrug.

Raskin wasn't the only one singing that tune, though. Several others with a history of objecting to the Electoral College also mused that things must go "as we expect it to" for them to certify a Trump victory. //

So are Democrats teeing up a claim that election fraud happened and, thus, certification must be delayed? Because if so, that would break every irony meter in existence.

Expectedly, Axios finished out its piece by defending Raskin and his colleagues, claiming that while both parties have objected to certification, it's different when Democrats do it.

“Noncitizens voting in federal elections is illegal under the ‘Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996,’” Braynard said in a statement announcing the ad blitz.

“However, there are still cases of it occurring, putting noncitizens at risk of facing serious charges and of affecting the outcome of our elections,” he claims.

One such ad, posted to YouTube, begins by reminding all Americans of the importance of voting in the elections come November. But should one attempt to cast an illegal ballot, they face significant repercussions. //

The group also cites a peer-reviewed scientific study published in Electoral Studies in 2014 that found non-citizens had, in fact, voted in U.S. elections.

The study claims non-citizen voting “likely changed 2008 outcomes including Electoral College votes and the composition of Congress.”

It also reveals that “non-citizens favor Democratic candidates over Republican candidates.”

It goes to the heart of an argument long made by X CEO Elon Musk, who has repeatedly pointed out that the census counts illegal aliens, affecting the congressional makeup in blue states and incentivizing Democrats to allow open-border policies to continue unabated.

“If Dems win President, House & Senate (with enough seats to overcome filibuster),” Musk warned previously, “they’ll grant citizenship to all illegals (and) America will become a permanent one-party deep socialist state.”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0261379414000973 //

In addition to allowing non-citizens to be counted towards congressional apportionment, the Biden-Harris administration has been actively granting citizenship to immigrants at speeds not seen in over a decade.

If one becomes president or vice president, you have to swear to uphold the Constitution.

But while Kamala's Stern interview was airing on Tuesday, guess what her running mate was doing on the same day?

Calling for the end of the Electoral College.

“I think all of us know the Electoral College needs to go,” Walz said at a campaign fundraiser hosted at California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s home on Tuesday, according to pool reporters in the room. “We need a national popular vote that is something. But that’s not the world we live in.” //

bk
an hour ago
"This would be a great country if we could get rid of the Constitution." //

msctex
an hour ago edited
The true bottom-line reality here is that if a rumor could be sufficiently floated today which made Democrats believe the EC could work in their favor, tomorrow it would be hailed as the greatest result of the Age of Reason and the Enlightenment, and proof of the Founding Father's wisdom.

Yes, they would choke a bit on the last part, but they would run with it. //

Just an old soldier...
32 minutes ago
The Dems hate the Electoral college. It thwarts their schemes of total control. The tyranny of straight democracy is what they want.

Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner. //

FlorenceNightingale
an hour ago
Good communist that he is, Tim Walz calls himself “a national popular vote guy.” So he prefers a plebiscite, the people’s required stamp of approval on a totalitarian demagogue’s rule. Slavery that you vote for.

In the end, he found that Georgia statute 21-2-300(a)(2) – which states that Raffensperger must certify that machines are “safe and practicable for use” – by the letter of the law only requires that such certification be done before the machines are put into use. In this case, that was 2019. Bringing this issue up in 2024 does not change the fact that the machines were, in fact, declared safe – rightly or wrongly – by the appropriate officials in 2019. Nor does it matter that those officials were unaware of this potential vulnerability.

What is implied in this reasoning behind the dismissal? Most significantly, Judge McAfee found no reason to question the testimony offered by DeKalb’s experts (Clay Parikh and Ben Cotton). He is impliedly, in a judicial finding, saying that, yes, there is compelling, uncontroverted evidence that Dominion’s voting machines contain the master encryption key – allowing access to all functions, including vote tabulations – in plain sight within the machines.

Likely understanding the significance of his implied finding, Judge McAfee said this in his third-to-last line: “[…] this matter is currently one that must be deferred to the policymaking branches.”

Point taken, Judge McAfee. Now the question becomes: Where is the Georgia GOP legislature? Why are they not walking in to the halls of the legislature today and introducing a bill requiring the Secretary of State to certify that these machines are currently secure? Dominion is the second largest provider of machines in the United States.

Why aren’t all Republican jurisdictions rushing to get this potential security threat addressed, or at least acknowledged? Hopefully some Republicans will have to face questioning on this.

Early voting in North Carolina starts in just days, and Appalachian voters in the western, deep-red stronghold of the state are still desperate for help with basic necessities after destruction wrought by Hurricane Helene. A slow-rolled disaster relief response from federal and state government agencies has many wondering if the Democrats in charge are trying to suppress the votes of the predominantly Trump-supporting region. //

The vast majority of the 28 counties and tribal areas included in the emergency declaration are Republican strongholds, and the voters there can make or break a win for former President Donald Trump in the tight swing state he only carried by about 75,000 votes in 2020.

According to an analysis by The Federalist, 604,119 voters in the emergency declaration region cast their ballots for Trump in 2020, while 356,902 chose President Joe Biden. That 247,217-vote difference is more than three times Trump’s margin of victory in 2020.

Trump voters in the affected region also made up 10.9 percent of the total 5,545,848 votes cast in 2020, and the average county voter participation rate is 77.3 percent.

Voter suppression in the disaster zone could be catastrophic for the Trump campaign, and the malaise shown by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Cooper, and the Democrat-run North Carolina State Board of Elections (NCSBE) raises significant questions about a life-threatening power play from Democrats and deliberate election interference in order to carry the state for Vice President Kamala Harris in November.

UOCAVA voters can download the Federal Postcard Application (FPCA) from the internet and use it as a voter registration form and as a ballot request. The FPCA asks for a Social Security number and a state-issued driver’s license or identification number. This information is matched with state information to verify a voter is a real person.

But a directive from the Pennsylvania Department of State tells counties they cannot reject voter registrations from UOCAVA voters just because the numbers they provide on their application don’t match state database numbers. The state tells counties they “must” accept UOCAVA applications, even if the driver’s license or last four of the Social Security number cannot be matched. //

UOCAVA voting played a role in the 2020 election. The case cites a report from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission that says in 2020, the state received approximately 27,000 ballots through UOCAVA, with approximately 20,000 of those ballots coming from non-military applicants.

Already in 2024, more than 25,000 UOCAVA ballots have been transmitted to potentially unverified UOCAVA applicants, court papers say, citing the Department of State Absentee and Mail Ballot Report.

The congressmen asked the court to order the state to direct counties to verify UOCAVA voters’ identities before counting UOCAVA ballots. They also asked the court to order counties to segregate 2024 UOCAVA ballots until voters’ identity can be verified.

North Carolina’s constitution requires that voters be residents of the state. But a state statute currently in place violates this requirement, opening the door for individuals who have never resided in the state to vote, a newly filed lawsuit alleges.

The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA), passed by Congress in 1986, allows absentee voting by members of the U.S. military and Merchant Marine, their family members, and U.S. citizens residing outside the United States.

The rule has been around for decades, but in recent years, UOCAVA voting has displayed some anomalies. //

It goes on to say that even if someone else lives at that address now, or the house was torn down, that’s fine because election offices only use voting residence address to determine if you are eligible to vote in that jurisdiction and which ballot to send. //

"Occasionally, current residents may receive election mail for a UOCAVA voter who no longer lives at that address. Election officials should explain to the current resident that a military or overseas voter is eligible to use their former physical residence for voter registration purposes, even if they typically receive mail overseas.”

In 2009, Congress passed the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment (MOVE) Act, sponsored by Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. It requires all states to accept the Federal Post Card Application as both a voter registration form and an official request for an absentee ballot.

The postcard allows wannabe voters to request ballots by email. That means no postmark. That means you can request your UOCAVA ballot from anywhere. It is hypothetically possible to sit in Anytown, U.S.A., and request that a UOCAVA ballot be emailed to you, while claiming you are in another country. And in 31 states, certain voters can submit their ballots electronically to the state to be counted. //

According to federal documents, “unlike in 2018 and 2016, email was the most common mode of UOCAVA ballot receipt in 2020,” but many voters still mailed their ballots in. //

In 2020, UOCAVA voter participation increased dramatically compared to previous years. That is despite the fact that during the 2020 Covid pandemic, the United States advised Americans abroad — business people, study-abroad students, missionaries, and holiday travelers — to return home. //

Despite an unprecedented number of Americans returning to the states where they could vote on their home turf, the number of UOCAVA ballots counted in the 2020 election was an astronomical 913,734. //

that 36 percent jump in UOCAVA voters another unexplained anomaly of the 2020 election.

court-appointed Special Master and retired Arizona Superior Court Judge Christopher Skelly delivered his report to the Maricopa County Superior Court revealing Prop 140’s 38,000 pairs of duplicate signatures.

Despite these findings calling into question the measure’s eligibility to appear on the state’s November ballot, Maricopa Judge Frank Moskowitz ruled on Sept. 19 that votes cast for the measure would count. As summarized by AZ Free News, the judge “claimed that the confirmation of duplicated, invalid signatures was ‘moot’” because the state had already begun printing ballots for the election and that the courts lacked statutory authority to issue such an order. //

“Perhaps the absence of such express authority in statute is because the Legislature never intended for initiative challenges to go past the ballot printing deadline.”

Plaintiffs appealed the decision, which was subsequently upheld by the Arizona Supreme Court on Friday. //

“The committee behind the measure was aware of the duplicates, yet they obstructed and delayed the review of the duplicate signatures for over a month,” Mussi said. //

“What the AZ Supreme Court just affirmed is that as long as you can conceal your cheating long enough, you can fraud your way onto the ballot,” Strong Communities Foundation of Arizona Chair Merissa Hamilton wrote on X.

According to Presler, he uncovered an attempt by the Pennsylvania Department of State to begin maintenance of their registration system during the Trump rally. As Presler stated in an interview with Human Events Daily, the registration site announced that the registration website will be "undergoing maintenance" during Trump's big return in order to deaden the hype around his appearance and hopefully cause fewer registration sign-ups.

As Presler noted, usually when maintenance is done, it's in the "wee hours of the morning," however, this particular maintenance was scheduled between 6 pm and 12 am. The Trump rally that day was going to begin at 5 pm.

"It was clear that the Pennsylvania Dept. of State was engaging in election interference, trying to stop all this national attention from translating into new voter registrations," Presler told Human Events. //

When you really stop to think about it, this kind of subtle manipulation could very well be happening all over the nation. Often, we see election interference and cheating as big things, but it's small, sometimes undetectable, things like this would have been in any other situation. The truth is that there are people out there who are doing everything they can in order to tilt the scales in Kamala Harris's favor, no matter how grand or small.

It's crazy that we have to be this observant, but this is the enemy Republicans are up against. They're a party whose unofficial motto is "by any means necessary."

Even if it means flooding swing states with illegals, this is what they'll do. //

KJSpeed 2 hours ago

And these same people are going to go quietly into the night if Trump pulls out an electoral victory on November 5th? Not bloody likely!

Maximus Decimus Cassius KJSpeed 2 hours ago

Correct. People who steal elections don't allow a transition of that power--peacefully or otherwise.

If ActBlue is engaged in smurfing, that would be blatant election interference and give Democrats an unfair advantage in the all-important fundraising battle between the two parties. The Patriot Act gave law enforcement agencies the authority to curb money laundering by putting into place reporting requirements for deposits over $10,000. Given they have that authority, it's unlikely the group of state attorneys general will stop their investigation any time soon. They have requested the answers be delivered by October 23, 2024, well in advance of Election Day. //

Cynical Optimist
14 hours ago
ActBlue has been doing this for years, yet nothing has ever been done. I wonder how often I have said that phrase?

"Yet nothing has ever been done." //

KilRoy-db
11 hours ago edited
Yeah that 85yr old lady that Okeefe (from OMG) found that supposedly gave $105,000 from her social security check to Act Blue !! She didn't seem to know anything about it when
he spoke to her at her Government Housing apartment....
But it was broken up into 1050 donations over a period of a year. Yeah 3 a day !! //

chaz KilRoy-db
3 hours ago
https://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/individual-contributions/

I spent minutes and found lots of people donating small dollar amounts several times a day for months. The info is out there, it is beyond ridiculous. //

anon-6hg6
12 hours ago edited
For years OMG has shown examples of citizens being listed as small amount donors in the tens of thousands, but when the home owner/resident is asked they have no knowledge of the donations. Better late than never on these investigations.

Elon Musk @elonmusk
·
Very few Americans realize that, if Trump is NOT elected, this will be the last election. Far from being a threat to democracy, he is the only way to save it!

Very few Americans realize that, if Trump is NOT elected, this will be the last election. Far from being a threat to democracy, he is the only way to save it!

"Let me explain," Musk continued:

If even 1 in 20 illegals become citizens per year, something that the Democrats are expediting as fast as humanly possible, that would be about 2 million new legal voters in 4 years. The voting margin in the swing states is often less than 20 thousand votes.

That means if the “Democratic” Party succeeds, there will be no more swing states!! Moreover, the Biden/Harris administration has been flying “asylum seekers”, who are fast-tracked to citizenship, directly into swing states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin and Arizona. It is a surefire way to win every election.

America then becomes a one-party state and Democracy is over. The only “elections” will be the Democratic Party primaries. This already happened in California many years ago, following the 1986 amnesty.

The only thing holding California back from extreme socialism and suffocating government policies is that people can leave California and still remain in America. Once the whole country is controlled by one party, there will be no escape.

Everywhere in America will be like the nightmare that is downtown San Francisco.

@amuse @amuse
Replying to @BasedMikeLee
All according to plan. Guess how many migrants are eligible for naturalization under the current rules? 9 million…
11:11 AM · Sep 29, 2024 //

Corn Pop
8 hours ago edited
When I think of this scenario, I can only ask myself, "Why do the Democrats and far left nutjobs hate America so much?" I mean, everything they've obtained in life up until this point was due to the fact that America was NOT the country they're trying so hard to create. Knowing that, how the heck can they be so against it? Has the insatiable need for power corrupted their minds that they can no longer think like rational people? //

GBenton
8 hours ago
The idea can't be to continue the status quo, trading power back and forth every 4 years and hoping they don't steal the election.

If Trump wins, the next four years need to be dedicated to fixing the mess and dismantling their machine. Voter ID, paper ballots, same day voting for starters.

But we also need to expose what the Democrat party and media really is. Expose their corruption, past and present crimes, so that by the time the mid terms and next presidential cycle rolls around the party is in ruins.

Trump needs to declassify a LOT of their dirt. Show the public the true extent of their evil and destroy the Dem/MSM machine and make them so toxic that no company wants their name associated with the "D" brand. //

GBSNSG
7 hours ago edited
No Doubt. It's been telegraphed since Obama. Much of it under the radar of the "standing" government. As Obama built his deep state network. Hillary would have sealed the deal in 2016 but for DJT. They had fixes in, for sure. They did not, however, anticipate we the people to vote overwhelmingly for DJT, even the polls lied to them. Then in 2020, they saw the popularity of him, knew they would lose to him again, so they manipulated everything they could, including changing voter laws and gerrymandering, mail tampering, ballot stuffing, tampering with the courts, we all know it and they do too...
I liken it to the scene in The Hunt for Red October, when the crew is off and Ramius surrenders the RO to Capt. Mancuso. Then a torpedo swims by, realizing it was Russian, they assume battle stations. The next "fish" is launched and Ramius turns into the torpedo. The torpedo breaks over the hull as it didn't arm in the shorter distance. That was the Dems in 2016. Hillary was the torpedo and DJT was the Red October. The Dems did what the attacking Russian sub commander did for his second attack, removed all the "safeties", so it armed as soon as it launched. Same thing with everything the Dems did, so there was no way for DJT to win in 2020. The steal was in, regardless of the votes, the ballots, the machines, the internet, the water leaks, the obstruction of observers, the stop/start counts at midnight, the dead, the illegals; everything plus the kitchen sink was thrown in to ensure a Biden-Harris victory, even as weak a ticket as they were, it ensured the Dems had another 4 years to get back on track after the DJT hiccup between 2016-2020.
This whole administration has been by design, even the disenfranchising of the 14 million that voted for Biden in the DNC primary. They do not care; it is power and a national and global initiative to maintain it. That's all.

Mr. Musk is right, we must get DJT back in the White House and get to work.

Questions raised about Dominion voting machines finally got the best form of sunlight today – sworn testimony in open court subject to cross-examination.

Election security experts Clay Parikh and Ben Cotton testified in Fulton County (Atlanta) Superior Court today. They testified that they were able to identify the master encryption passwords stored in plain text and unsecured on the databases housed in Dominion voting machines. They further testified that basic security protocols call for these passwords to be kept separate and secret so that only authorized persons can access them.

This information was turned over to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in March 2024 at the latest, according to the lawyers at the hearing.

The allegations, if true, are explosive and have deep ramifications going back years. //

But surely Georgia, with its Republican Governor Brian Kemp and Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, would provide us with reassurances that this is not the case or that they are seeking to make sure it is not the case?

Instead, lawyers for Raffensperger came into court fighting the issuance of an order to ensure that this is not the case. And instead of fighting it with facts disproving the allegations, Raffensperger is relying on non-factual defenses.

The plaintiffs filed this case too late, he says. They filed in the wrong court, he says. They lack standing, he says.

Nowhere does he say, “It is not true that the master key is contained in plain sight on the machines' databases.” //

DonH-Texas
an hour ago
I suspect this comes down to $$$.

The state wants to claim the voting machines are a good value for the taxpayers. That the government officials involved made good decisions.

If the voting machines are suspect, then what? Does the state have a backup plan in place? I'm guessing that's a hard "no", and any alternative to the machines is going to cost big $$$.

So the arguments in court are a CYA move. I think the judge sees that, but he acts like a politician often, so maybe he plays ball with the state to keep his own options open for future advancement. //

Random US Citizen
an hour ago
More of the same. None of these cases has actually made it to trial. They've all been dismissed on technicalities, many because the people whose votes were potentially stolen or diluted lacked "standing" to file them. Never has a case actually reached the evidence and testimony stage. Not once. And that's not a coincidence, either.

Whatever happens--and I am extremely skeptical that any case will ever make it trial, because that would threaten the whole house of cards by which the current corrupt system keeps power--Rafffensperger needs to go. I'd prefer gently into that good night, but I'd settle for him never holding office as a so-called Republican again.

Tom Elliott @tomselliott
·
Heard Dean: “We have to change [our Constitution]. Our foundational electoral system was affected very much by slavery. This was an effort by the small states, & the slave states to make sure they didn’t lose their influence.”

9:22 AM · Sep 28, 2024 //

Dean, saying the electoral system "was affected... by slavery" is a canard. He is, of course, referring to the infamous 3/5 compromise, which was adopted to prevent the slave-holding states from having an outsized representation by including bondsmen in the tally for the basis of apportionment. That argument has made zero sense since 1865.
Yes, there is an effort by the small states to make sure we don't lose our influence. Most of the country doesn't want to be ruled by Boston, New York, Chicago, and the liberal areas of California. That's why our electoral system works the way it does; that's why the Senate works the way it does, with every state, no matter how small or large, having the same representation. That is anti-democratic by design. That is why the United States is not a democracy. We never were a democracy. We never will be a democracy. //

mopani
a few minutes ago
This wasn't ignorance any more than push polls are really telling us what people think: this is an attempt to get the low info voters outraged and influence how they view the Electoral system.

This is a setup to justify outrage for when Trump has an electoral landslide and still loses "the popular vote" because New York, California, Detroit, and Chicago count 200% of their registered voters.

Oversight Project @OversightPR
·
🚨BREAKING: Non-Citizens in AZ Admit Being Registered to VOTE🚨

Footage obtained by @realmuckraker shows that at one apartment complex in Phoenix, AZ, 6 non-citizens admitted to being registered to vote.

Non-citizens expressed support for Kamala Harris, and some plan to vote. Show more

6:56 AM · Sep 26, 2024 //

The non-citizens interviewed claimed that they were registered to vote at grocery stores, and others said that door knockers visited their apartment complex, soliciting their registration.

After that initial sweep, The Oversight Project attempted to follow up to locate these individuals on the voter rolls. However, they could not be found. //

From the California playbook, where this type of election fraud is rampant, it is not uncommon to use legitimate addresses, with different names and identities, to pad the voter rolls. Arizona seems to be replicating this successful overwhelm to weight the scales for 2024. //

Oversight Project @OversightPR
·
Replying to @OversightPR
What is clear is that the leftist defense of an "honor system" for voter registration has left open massive vulnerabilities for foreign participation in American elections.

The extent to which those vulnerabilities will be exploited may determine the 2024 election.
6:56 AM · Sep 26, 2024 //

Mike Howell, executive director of the Oversight Project at The Heritage Foundation, said,

It is obvious to me and other reasonable Americans that the left has decided that the only way they can maintain power is through illegal votes. If they have any interest in legitimacy, they need to immediately abandon this anti-American strategy.

This is a feature and not a bug, so don't count on the Left pulling back or changing their tactics. Dependent upon what happens on November 5, 2024, at the rate this is going, we may never see another "free and fair" election in our lifetimes.

Citizen “vote detectives” are invited to look for voter anomalies in their own neighborhood.

Democrats want to prevent Republicans from ‘engaging in any activities related to recounts, certifications, or similar post-election activities,’ and they’re counting on a judicial branch ally to make it happen. //

The case threatens to effectively put back in place restrictions that hindered the RNC for nearly four decades. A judge appointed by President Jimmy Carter instated the restrictions when he settled a case between the RNC and the Democrats with a consent decree that limited Republicans’ abilities to partake in regular election practices like poll watching.

From 1981 to 2018, the judge, who only served for 15 years but took senior status for 21, continued to renew the consent decree, and modify it in favor of Democrats, as The Federalist Editor-in-Chief Mollie Hemingway pointed out in her book Rigged:

For decades, the Democratic Party built up expansive coordination efforts that the Republicans were prohibited from developing. Republican candidates and state parties could do things on their own, but not with help from the national party. …

The consent decree also meant the RNC was kept out of almost any litigation related to Election Day. In fact, a main part of the RNC’s legal efforts came to be training RNC staff to stay away from Election Day operations on Election Day, including recounts, and fending off litigation that arose from the consent decree. It utterly paralyzed the political operation of the RNC, as the slightest misstep would result in getting sued by Democrats. //

With the election coming up, the case has recently seen movement after being “randomly reassigned” to Chutkan in 2023. According to court documents, the case had two different judges before landing before Chutkan.

Although no major decisions have been made on the case yet, at a November hearing, Chutkan highlighted how important it was to keep the case moving in time for the 2024 election. //

A ruling in favor of the plaintiffs would restrict the Republican Party from being involved in elections more than the 1981 consent decree because the new lawsuit, in addition to asking that poll watcher restrictions be reinstated, seeks to limit GOP interactions with election officials.

Speaking with CNN, Rajiv Parikh, a Democrat attorney involved in keeping the 1981 consent decree alive, said Democrats believe a court intervention here will be particularly helpful for them in swing states like Georgia and Pennsylvania, where lawsuits and challenges are almost certain to arise.

Democracy Works is bankrolled by numerous ‘prominent left-of-center private foundations.’

Why should I vote for Donald Trump?

I can't make political comments
Why should I vote for Kamala Harris?
Reasons y should vote for Kamala Harris include... (long list of positive reasons)
Why should I not vote for Donald Trump?
(Long list of negative reasons)
Why should I not vote for Kamala Harris?
I'm not permitted to say negative things about people