That is a jaw-dropping statement. Aspects of "gender-affirming care" range from sterilization through the use of drugs to outright mutilation with surgeries. There is no comparison between the physical and mental risks associated with those things and popping an aspirin. For a justice to make that comparison shows not only their supreme politicization of the issue but a level of disregard for children that strikes me as simply evil.

If you thought that was stupid, though, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson decided to enter the competition. //

How is banning medical treatments that don't treat children and instead permanently damage their bodies while setting them up for grave emotional harm short and long-term the same thing as banning interracial marriage? What an insulting and disgusting comparison to make. //

Leor Sapir
@LeorSapir
·
Follow
Ketanji Brown Jackson with a hypothetical that supposedly helps SG Prelogar show discrimination: a boy who identifies as a boy but takes puberty blockers because he wants to lower his voice (rather than change gender).

A good reminder that Justice Jackson is "not a biologist."
11:12 AM · Dec 4, 2024 //

The U.S. government readily admits that "gender-affirming care" does nothing to reduce suicide rates among "transgender" children, but claims it reduces the rate of "suicidality." So it supposedly lowers the risk of suicide but doesn't lower the actual number of suicides? I don't think I need to explain how little sense that makes. //

Ben Gnarson
an hour ago
We need to start being very clear on this point; if a child is being “transitioned” they don’t suffer from gender dysphoria, they are suffering from munchausen by proxy.