413 private links
We have an ongoing cover-up of the important facts as Joseph Biden is sitting in the Oval Office. We know that he stared right into the camera as the president and lied repeatedly—I mean, multiple times—he lied directly multiple times about his involvement and knowledge of his son’s business dealings. We all know that now. //
So, the question Johnson and most intellectually honest people are asking is why Biden lied. Why continually repeat a falsehood that he had no knowledge of the business dealings if they were all above board? The most logical answer is that they weren't all above board. //
Johnson said he believes there is "an overwhelming amount of evidence, and that seems to indicate that he was involved and that they did know about this, and that the family did benefit from it."
"I think we might be arguing about high crimes and misdemeanors, but I’m not so certain bribery is not involved in some way here, either," Johnson said. "And of course, bribery is specifically listed in the Constitution, and so we have an obligation to pursue it." //
MarkB
8 hours ago
The nerve of Mike Johnson to be making totally unfounded speculations!
Sure there are bank records. And wire transfers. And Special Activity Reports. And 20 LLCs. Oh and plenty of incriminating texts. And emails. Wait, I almost forgot about photos and WhatsApp messages. Ah, I just remembered the voice mail from Joe to Hunter about the NYT article. 2 key business partners confirmed that Joe was the Big Guy. Proof of personal checks shuffling $ around within the family. Oh and 2 IRS whistleblowers delivering the reeipts. And Biden on video bragging about he blackmailed Ukraine into firing the special prosecutor looking into Burisma.
Nope. No evidence whatsoever. Mike better be careful, I'm sure there will be a special prosecutor assigned soon to investigate and reveal his attempts to undermine democracy.