In other words, as the user effectively causes the AI to speak a certain way to them or behave in a certain manner, the user is also programming themselves to desire certain things. It creates a dependency that only an AI can fill.

Now ask yourself how that would work when you introduce sex. Ask yourself how that work for someone if the sex they want comes from a perversion no one should have. //

redstateuser
2 hours ago
Her prediction is unrealistic and fanciful. I think AI pedophilia (AIP, for short) would not eliminate real-world pedophilia (RWP) but that both would survive and in fact flourish. Legalizing marijuana did not eliminate black-market pot as claimed by pro-pot folks. In many instances, black market pot has increased and can be sold more cheaply, not having taxes applied to it. Allowing AIP will eventually inure us and groom in us an increased compassion for those who seek RWP. And try to think down the road, how creative lawmakers and liberals will be in pushing the boundaries of AIP into related areas.
Don't fall for this again, that legalizing something currently illegal will make all users cooperatively think, "Oh, ok, let's do it only that way." //

Sarcastic Frog
2 hours ago
Not mentioned is what happens when someone wrapped up in this has to interact with Real people in Real life.
Real people won't behave the way the person is now "programmed" to expect, or say what the person wants to hear. No human being will ever match up to this Artificial representation.
And what happens next? Murder, because the Real isn't as perfect as the Artificial?