68 °F above average is a lot. For a tropical country it is not credible for temperatures to be that much warmer than average because the average is too high to give enough headroom. So what gives?

Reading the article I found this:

parts of Malawi saw a maximum temperature of 43C (109F), compared with an average of nearly 25C (77F)

As I expected the actual temperature increase was 32 °F, not 68 °F. So what’s up with that headline? Here’s a hint: this is what the headline might say if you set your location to somewhere other than the United States:

Now “nearly 20C” is an odd way of saying “18 °C”, but I guess they really like round numbers, and that’s not the problem. The problem is that somebody – the localization team? an algorithm? – decided that 20 °C was equivalent to 68 °F. And they’re not wrong. And yet they are.

When converting from a temperature in Celsius to one in Fahrenheit you have to multiply by 1.8 (because each degree Celsius covers a range 1.8 times as large as a degree Fahrenheit) and you have to add 32 °F (because the freezing point in Fahrenheit is 32, compared to 0 in Celsius). However if you are converting a temperature difference you just multiply by 1.8. //

This is just another version of the fallacy involved when somebody says that it is “twice as hot” when the temperature goes from 5 °C to 10 °C – note that this is equivalent to going from 278 K to 283 K, or 41 °F to 50 °F, so clearly not “twice as hot” in any meaningful way.