Can Britain be saved from itself? The latest example of submission to Muslims took place in London, where a British lawyer wearing a Star of David necklace near a pro-Palestinian protest outside the Israeli Embassy was arrested for his provocative behavior. After all, the mere sight of that necklace could cause the mob to become angry, even violent, and instead of protecting the lawyer from possible violence by the mob, the Metropolitan Police arrested him. More on this absurdity can be found here: “London police detain Jew for wearing Star of David, ‘antagonizing’ pro-Palestine protesters,” Jerusalem Post, October 19, 2025: //

He was there not to provoke — after all, he could have been in real trouble from a maddened mob — but to record that mob’s behavior and what he believed were its violations of the law, including laws against hate crimes. Instead the police chose to arrest him, handcuff him, and hold him for ten hours, as they tried to figure out they could charge him with, but came up empty and had to let him go.

A mob’s yelling and screaming against Israel and Jews is apparently okay, according to the British police. A single man, wearing a Star of David neckless and silently recording that mob’s behavior, deserves to be arrested.

Turns out anyone can join the International Association of Genocide Scholars. //

Any organization can claim to be an expert on genocide and recruit enough members committed to the destruction of Israel to say that the Jewish state is guilty of it. A functional media would weed out such imposters. Unfortunately, our media is uninterested in vetting its headlines—or even retracting the items proven to be untrue. In the current climate, news consumers should be advised to assume that everything they hear about Israel is an op until proven otherwise. That includes New York Times front page stories like the fake famine picture they published in July.

As for genocide, it really did happen during the Gaza War. What transpired in southern Israel on October 7, 2023 was genocide. It was unusual in a way that the perpetrators accused the Jewish state of that of which they are guilty themselves. Avraham Russel Shalev of Kohelet Policy Forum recently wrote a paper concluding that:

Hamas’ October 7 attack constitutes genocide under international law. This conclusion rests on three interconnected pillars. First, the physical acts committed—the systematic killing of over 1,200 Israelis, accompanied by torture, sexual violence, and mutilations—satisfy the actus reus requirement of the Genocide Convention. Second, Hamas’ specific intent to destroy Israeli Jews is evident through multiple channels: its foundational ideology of eliminationist antisemitism, its decades-long systematic policy of incitement, its detailed operational planning for mass killing, and explicit statements by its leadership before and during the attack.

What distinguishes this case, however, is the third element: the immediate deployment of reverse genocide accusation against the victims.

This is what the media defenders of Gaza call “every accusation is a confession,” only they direct their venom against the Jews. The Jewish case is persuasive. Will the media ever give it a minute of their attention? //

jb4 | September 6, 2025 at 9:37 am
Per Google and Al Jazeera about 65,000 of the 2.1 million Gaza population, or about 3%, has been killed in just under 2 years, most of whom would have been Hamas fighters. Given that Israel had the capacity to wipe out 100% of the population on October 8, this “genocide” may go down in history as the most incompetently ever conducted. /s

Jung describes a “complex” as a fragment of the psyche, emotionally charged and buried in the unconscious, that seizes control of perception when activated. These complexes are not chosen. They emerge unsolicited, often from unexamined pain, fear, or inherited narratives.

No one escapes them. I certainly haven’t. They explain how otherwise decent people can behave in baffling and morally catastrophic ways. It is the transformation of the beloved into the stranger, of Dr. Jekyll into Mr. Hyde, or Walter White into Heisenberg. We all live in tension between who we hope to be and what stirs beneath.

If I were to hazard a careful speculation (not an indictment), it would be that two powerful complexes have been activated in those I once trusted to see clearly. Their convergence has created a kind of moral short-circuit, the fallout of which I experience as abandonment disguised as principle.

The first complex is ancient. Antisemitism has sedimented over three millennia, shaping instinct, imagination, and judgment long before reason arrived. The Jew has always been the collective scapegoat, so naturally, we appear as “oppressor” in the false binary of modern moral imagination.

The second complex emerges from my peers’ self-image which is empathic, righteous, and principled, upon which their sense of meaning and virtue depends. Anything that threatens one’s self-image (regardless of construction) doesn’t just feel like criticism, but annihilation.

Their empathy flows to suffering, but more keenly to the symbolic innocent. Gazans are framed as the archetypal oppressed (stateless, brown, and grievable) while Jews, especially Israelis, are cast as hardened white-passing survivors-turned-state-builders. In a reductionist culture that equates power with guilt, Jewish strength not only erases Jewish pain, but is recast as villainous. //

I recall, perhaps bitterly, that Pharaoh’s heart was hardened so that God might deliver him a lesson he would never forget; that we are commanded not to hate the Egyptian, for we were strangers in his land; and that Christ, in his agony, still prayed: “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.”

It is not my job to bring friends or enemies to consciousness. But for their sake and for mine, I can no longer remain silent. The Torah commands: “You shall surely rebuke your neighbor, and not bear sin because of him.” (Leviticus 19:17)

This rebuke is not vengeance. It is an act of spiritual hygiene. A way to prevent my conscience from curdling into complicity.

Empathy that never reaches the particular is not empathy, but abstraction. Jews, if nothing else, are particular. We are not asking for guilt or allegiance. We are not asking to be centered. We are simply asking to be seen. //

Jung wrote, “Until you make the unconscious conscious, it will direct your life and you will call it fate.” A reckoning may come to my friends, as it often does, and often with great cost.

I pray it brings not ruin, but reflection. Not shame, but conscience. Not performative solidarity, but the real thing.

With this latest video, we now know why the terrorist was shirtless in the aftermath. He caught himself on fire as he threw the Molotov cocktails at his innocent victims. //

Left-wing immigration lawyer Eric Lee revealed on social media that it was his outfit that filed the Habeas petition, claiming that deporting Soliman's family was retribution for his crimes. He also played on emotion, noting that all five children are minors. //

Not discussed in Lee's post is whether they have any right to be here in the first place. Someone's father committing a terror attack doesn't give his family magical immunity from being deported, just like anyone else who overstays a visa. This kind of weaponization of the legal system, making it impossible for elected officials to exercise even the most basic aspects of their statutory power, is going to destroy the judiciary. That this case enjoys another level of absurdity only makes it worse. //

With this latest video, we now know why the terrorist was shirtless in the aftermath. He caught himself on fire as he threw the Molotov cocktails at his innocent victims.

Secretary Marco Rubio @SecRubio
·
In light of yesterday’s horrific attack, all terrorists, their family members, and terrorist sympathizers here on a visa should know that under the Trump Administration we will find you, revoke your visa, and deport you.
3:56 PM · Jun 2, 2025. //

Per Fox News' Bill Melugin, Soliman "allegedly told investigators that he waited to carry out the attack until his daughter graduated high school." //

It sounds as though her post-graduation plans will not include remaining in the United States.

The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) released the official video of the Eurovision 2025 record on Friday, sparking a major controversy. Yuval Raphael, who finished second in the contest with "New Day Will Rise," does not appear anywhere in this music compilation. The Israeli singer had won the audience's vote before climbing to second overall, compensating for her fifteenth place among the jurors. Despite this remarkable success, no footage of her performance is included in the official montage, unlike the representatives of Austria, Estonia, Sweden, Germany, and France. //

This is not an isolated case. In 2023, Noa Kirel, third place in the contest, appeared in the official clip. The following year, Eden Golan, who came fifth, was absent. According to observers, this recurrence contributes to a "clear trend" of gradually excluding Israeli representatives from the official Eurovision productions. The EBU has not responded to these allegations, which tarnish the contest's image of neutrality.

People who are invested in making sure there’s democracy and freedom of religion — Catholics, Baptists, Muslims, Jews, Christians — we have an obligation to protect Jewish Americans to make sure they have the same rights. If those rights aren't protected, our rights are not protected. //

anon-89ic
2 hours ago edited
As a civil rights lawyer, I've never been worried about right-wing anti-Semitism in the United States, which, at most, is comprised of a few lunkheads I've never met. The Democrats have had a strong strain of anti-Semitism since FDR, and Truman made it a policy after Israel was reestablished (with the other Truman doctrine we rarely hear about)--that American support for Israel was tied to forcing Israel not to be too Jewish in exchange for arms, and holding American Jewish voters hostage to American support of Israel. Carter made anti-Semitism institutional at Camp David, and the current Dems have moved that anti-Semitism to the front of its coalition. And Harvard is the cradle of the Establishment Left along with NPR (Nominally Palestinian Radio) and the rest of the mainstream media. Recap--right wingers are a few lunkhead individuals. Left wing anti-Semitism is official policy of the Democratic Party, its colleges and its attack dogs at places like the SPLC and even the ADL. All you have to do is bring a case against black municipal officials in major blue cities over anti-Semitic policies and out come those attack dogs screaming "Free Palestine."' Let's drop the idea that this is a bipartisan problem. The Democratic Party of the United States in 2025 and the National Socialist Party of Germany in 1933 share a platform, and it has to be rooted out. Sorry Terrell, but your community talks a good game but is a big part of the problem. //

St. Joseph, Terror of Demons
10 hours ago
“First they came for the Communists,
And I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Communist.

Then they came for the Socialists,
And I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
And I did not speak out—
Because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,
And I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me,
And there was no one left to speak out for me.”

The Washington Post
@washingtonpost
·
Follow
The killings of two Israeli Embassy staffers amplify confusion felt since the Oct. 7, 2023 attacks about where Jews belong.
washingtonpost.com
For U.S. Jews, D.C. museum killings deepen resolve — and fear
1:40 PM · May 23, 2025 //

It's not as horrible as the tweet. It has interviews/comments with some Jewish people, who say they are worried after the shooting, along with sharing concerns raised by statistics of discrimination against Jewish people going up.

But it also had this:

Hamas’s attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, Israel’s subsequent attacks on Gaza, followed by divisions around the world over what had caused the conflict and who was at fault...

Um, guys? What caused the conflict was a vicious - some might even say, genocidal - attack on Israel, where Hamas terrorists killed about 1,200 people, raped and terrorized many others, and kidnapped 251 hostages. The attack, naturally, got a response. Hamas was at fault for the attack and for everything that followed; this isn't rocket science. //

anon-ncj5
an hour ago
"Hamas’s attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, Israel’s subsequent attacks on Gaza, followed by divisions around the world over what had caused the conflict and who was at fault.."

"Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941, America's subsequent response, followed by divisions around the world over what had caused the conflict and who was at fault..."

"This administration is holding Harvard accountable for fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus," said Secretary Kristi Noem. "It is a privilege, not a right, for universities to enroll foreign students and benefit from their higher tuition payments to help pad their multibillion-dollar endowments. Harvard had plenty of opportunity to do the right thing. It refused. They have lost their Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification as a result of their failure to adhere to the law. Let this serve as a warning to all universities and academic institutions across the country.". //

Noem has been requesting records regarding visa-holding students so they can see if any of them are troublemakers and inciting hate and violence. Harvard has mostly been stonewalling her efforts.

Unless this conflict gets resolved quickly, Harvard can no longer enroll foreign students for the 2025-2026 school year. Existing foreign students, meanwhile, must transfer or they’ll have their legal status to reside in the U.S. revoked. //

bk
9 hours ago
she gave them 72 hours to respond if they don’t want this punishment to go forward.
It'll only take them a couple hours to find a federal judge in Boston to put a hold on it.

thinkingoutloud bk
7 hours ago
DEC 10, 2024 in a 9-0 SCOTUS decision:
"The nation’s highest court unanimously ruled that the head of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) possesses expansive discretionary powers to rescind previously approved visa applications, without being subjected to judicial oversight. This decision in the Bourfa v. Mayorkas case reaffirmed the Secretary’s authority to revoke immigration petitions “for what he deems to be good and sufficient cause” as stipulated in 8 United States Code (USC) §1155."
https://congressionalpost.com/supreme-court-government-can-cancel-immigration-visas-anytime/

According to the footage, Rodriguez shot Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim in the back as they prepared to cross the street.

Lischinsky, identified as Decedent-2 in the affidavit, was declared dead at the scene. Milgrim, identified as Decedent-1 in the affidavit, was not killed immediately; Rodriguez shot her again as she attempted to crawl away, and then again after he stopped to reload his firearm. A total of 21 expended 9mm cartridge casings were recovered. //

When Rodriguez was interviewed by agents, after waiving his Miranda rights he "expressed admiration for the actions of an individual who self-immolated in front of the Israeli Embassy in Washington D.C. on February 25, 2024, as a form of protest intended to draw attention to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict" and labeled that man a "martyr." Prior to that interview, according to MPD officers, Rodriguez stated, "I did it for Palestine. I did it for Gaza. I am unarmed."

The father of one of the slain Israeli Embassy staffers broke his silence about his daughter's death, noting the irony of the relentless work she'd done to find peace between Israelis and Palestinians before being killed by the alleged suspect, who shouted "free, free Palestine" during his arrest. //

"Last night, she was attending an affair to figure out how to get more aid into Gaza," Milgrim told The Post. "The night she was killed, she was trying to help the situation – that's the irony."

In a recent piece for National Review, John Yoo and Robert Delahunty argue the Trump administration is justified in challenging Harvard’s tax-exempt status. Citing the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Bob Jones University v. the United States (1983), the authors point to precedent establishing university policies “contrary to a fundamental public policy” and in violation of “deeply and widely accepted views of elementary justice” constitute grounds for revoking 501(c)(3) status.

It can be added that the administration is on solid ground in stripping funding from Harvard under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars institutions receiving federal assistance from discriminating on the basis of race, color, or national origin. That action was recently taken in response to Harvard’s rejection of the Trump administration’s settlement proposal following its investigation of Harvard’s failure to protect Jewish students from targeted harassment and violence. The terms of the settlement included several reforms, the most controversial of which required Harvard to take reasonable action to address rampant viewpoint discrimination against conservative-leaning students and faculty.

For Yoo and Delahunty, this minimally proscriptive requirement (asking Harvard to consult with an external party of its choosing) is a bridge too far as it “seem[s] to fall outside the mandate of a national government whose only true power here is to end racial discrimination and ensure that its grant recipients obey the Constitution and federal law.” //

First, consider that Yoo and Delahunty warn of a potential return to abusive diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies. The argument that conservatives should be careful not to go too far lest leftists reciprocate would carry more weight had leftists not already gone deep into that territory. That ship has sailed.

As sure as the sun rises in the east, the next leftist presidential administration will work to roll back the Trump administration’s civil rights reforms. The right’s newfound willingness to employ the potent tools of the civil rights state does not constitute the end of the left’s willingness to do the same. Rather, it means a formerly one-way, left-only ratchet now operates bidirectionally. //

The Trump administration should act boldly, as its rivals have acted before and will act again. It should wield its civil rights authorities to replace the left’s outcomes-based (“equity”) spoils system with one rooted in the principles of color-blind meritocracy.

This leads to the second problem with Yoo and Delahunty’s take: Although viewpoint discrimination is not prohibited under civil rights law, there is a clear connection between an aggressive left-wing campus monoculture and tolerance of campus antisemitism. The core tenets of the dominant “woke” paradigm cast Jews as “oppressors” by virtue of their success and proximity to whites. The institutionalization of this paradigm in higher education contributes to an astonishing two-thirds of 18-to-24-year-olds now asserting that Jews as a “class are oppressors.”

The Trump administration is right to hold Harvard accountable, not only for its toleration of antisemitism but also for the full range of civil rights violations it inflicts on students, faculty, and staff. It should aggressively wield its authorities to address rampant viewpoint discrimination at elite universities, understanding that such discrimination is intimately related to other forms of discrimination explicitly prohibited under federal law.

The Qatari government is funding teacher salaries, curriculums, and programming in school districts large and small across the country, allowing the small country to pursue a scheme of indoctrinating America’s youth.

That is what the first batch of public records requests from OpenTheBooks, reviewed by The Federalist, shows. The “cradle-to-graduation propaganda pipeline” includes grooming teachers to advance Qatari influence and talking points, angling soft cultural changes through language and field trip opportunities, and ultimately, as OpenTheBooks points out, creating “the next generation of activists ready to sew chaos on college campuses.”

Joel M. Petlin @Joelmpetlin
·
The pro Hamas mob attacked two non Jewish janitors at Columbia, calling them "Jew lovers," as they beat them and held them against their will.

Now please tell me why there are people who are still supporting the violent masked mob and not the minority workers who they assaulted?

The Free Press @TheFP
"The Columbia University janitors who were held hostage during the violent takeover of a campus building last spring are suing their alleged captors for battery, assault, and conspiracy to violate their civil rights, according to a copy of the suit reviewed exclusively by The Free Press.
5:12 PM · Apr 26, 2025

Certainly flips the script on "oppressed" and "oppressor." Marxism hardest hit.

The janitors were working the night shift as heavy cleaners. What were they cleaning? The New York Post reported that the janitors were forced to scrub the swastikas that had been spray-painted in the building. //

As reports indicated, these professionally organized protests were funded primarily by George Soros' Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), US Campaign for Palestinian Rights (USCPR), and other left-wing concerns.

Many Jewish students are disgusted with the university’s behavior:

Harvard students and alumni are speaking out after the university announced it is suing the Trump administration rather than comply with its demands to address antisemitism on its campus.

"The government withheld funds from racist schools that refused to integrate. The Obama administration repeatedly threatened to withhold federal funds to sexist schools that refused to combat sexual assault. The Trump Administration's efforts are in no way an unprecedented threat on higher education. Should Harvard still like to enjoy American taxpayer money, they can simply choose to comply with federal law at any point," Harvard student Shabbos Kestenbaum told Fox News Digital. //

Jews Fight Back 🇺🇸🇮🇱 @JewsFightBack
·
Every time someone says “as a Jew” right before minimizing Jew-hatred or covering for institutions that enable it, antisemites everywhere breathe a collective sigh of relief.

Alan Garber isn’t speaking as a Jew.
He’s speaking as a coward.
11:24 AM · Apr 22, 2025. //

anon-u7cz
8 minutes ago
Beth Israel Hospital in Boston was founded in 1916 by the city’s Jewish community to address significant barriers faced by Jewish immigrants and Jewish medical professionals during an era marked by religious separatism and widespread anti-Semitism. At the time, Jewish patients and physicians often encountered discrimination at other hospitals, which limited both access to care and professional opportunities.

The Trump administration has ordered the Internal Revenue Service to revoke Harvard University's tax-exempt status. This status allows Harvard to avoid paying income and property taxes, and donations to Harvard provide leftist billionaires with massive tax deductions for charitable contributions. //

As that action gathers steam, the Department of Homeland Security is considering withdrawing Harvard's ability to matriculate foreign students. The concern here is the number of foreign students at Harvard who seem as interested in pro-Hamas demonstrations as they are in attending classes. //

Harvard was told that it had to eradicate the DEI filters it uses in admissions to bring its processes into compliance with federal law and Supreme Court rulings. It was also told to take positive action to suppress what appears to be an official policy of antisemitism, or at least pro-terrorism, by Harvard's administration. Fair dealing and protecting Jewish students from harassment and discrimination were just a bridge too far for Harvard President Alan Garber. "The administration’s prescription goes beyond the power of the federal government," he huffed. "It violates Harvard’s First Amendment rights and exceeds the statutory limits of the government’s authority under Title VI. And it threatens our values as a private institution devoted to the pursuit, production, and dissemination of knowledge. No government—regardless of which party is in power—should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue."

He's missing the point. No one is requiring Harvard to do anything differently. The government is not threatening to take control. It is simply saying that if you wish to receive government benefits, you must comply with the same rules as any other educational institution and with federal law. Harvard's obeisance to DEI, for instance, runs up against two Supreme Court precedents. In Students for Fair Admissions vs. Harvard, the Supreme Court ruled that race was an impermissible factor in college admissions; see BREAKING: Supreme Court Rejects Race-Based College Admissions – RedState. The 1983 decision, Bob Jones University vs. United States, established that "The Government's fundamental, overriding interest in eradicating racial discrimination in education substantially outweighs whatever burden denial of tax benefits places on petitioners' exercise of their religious beliefs." //

DaveM
3 hours ago
This really isn't that difficult. Harvard allows Jewish students to be harassed on the basis of their religion- which is

1. Illegal at every level of government anywhere in the US. Those4 harassing Jewish students are committing prosecutable acts

2. By failing to provide a safe learning environment Harvard itself is in direct violation of multiple laws at both the Federal and State levels.

Harvard University @Harvard
·
The university will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights. Neither Harvard nor any other private university can allow itself to be taken over by the federal government.
harvard.edu
Research Funding
1:07 PM · Apr 14, 2025 //

Team Trump was not amused:

"Harvard’s statement today reinforces the troubling entitlement mindset that is endemic in our nation's most prestigious universities and colleges – that federal investment does not come with the responsibility to uphold civil rights laws," the task force said. "The disruption of learning that has plagued campuses in recent years is unacceptable. The harassment of Jewish students is intolerable.

"It is time for elite universities to take the problem seriously and commit to meaningful change if they wish to continue receiving taxpayer support," the statement continued. "The Joint Task Force to combat anti-Semitism is announcing a freeze on $2.2 billion in multi-year grants and $60M in multi-year contract value to Harvard University." //

Hillsdale College @Hillsdale
·
There is another way:

Refuse taxpayer money. //

I've been reporting on similar stories in recent months, and one thing has struck me: the unbelievable amount of federal dollars that are poured annually into these institutions. Harvard has an endowment of—sit down for this—$52 billion. You wouldn’t think they’d need much help now, would you? Yet they’re the beneficiary of nearly $9 billion in multi-year federal grants and contracts. For DOGE's next trick, I would encourage them to find out where the heck that massive pile of money is going (not only at Harvard but at many other schools as well). //

Quiverfull
4 hours ago edited
Hillsdale, FTW. Literally the finest college in the country. Founded as an abolitionist school in 1844, never took a penny of government money, kids are wicked smart, most love the Lord, and they stand alone against government oppression. For instance, their stance on Covid (seems so long ago....) was epic and fearless.

TRUMP: I blame the Democrats, and Chuck Schumer is a Palestinian, as far as I'm concerned. He used to be Jewish. He's not Jewish anymore. He's a Palestinian.

(Reporters erupt). //

houdini1984
8 hours ago
"Palestinian" is just another way to say antisemite. Schumer is a Palestinian.

January 27, 2025

Today marks the 80th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz-Birkenau, the Nazi concentration camp in Poland that stood at the center of the Holocaust and focus for their systematic slaughter of the Jewish people. Between 1940 and 1945, more than one million Jews, religious leaders, disabled persons, and other innocent victims were viciously and mercilessly executed in Auschwitz at the hands of the evil Nazi regime — culminating in one of the darkest chapters in human history. On this solemn day, America joins the Jewish community, the people of Poland, and the entire world in mourning the lives lost, the souls battered, the heroes forgotten, and the countless men and women who gave their lives for the cause of freedom. //

As we commemorate this somber occasion, we pay tribute to the undying spirit of the Jewish community. We reaffirm our commitment to educating our children and every future generation about the horrors that took place within the confines of Auschwitz and other concentration and death camps. We renew our resolve to end anti-Semitism and religious bigotry of all forms. We proudly reassert our strong bonds of friendship with the State of Israel. And we declare the timeless truth that every human being is a child of God and inherently worthy of dignity and respect.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim January 27, 2025, as a National Day of Remembrance of the 80th Anniversary of the Liberation of Auschwitz. On this day, I call upon every American citizen to observe this day with programs, ceremonies, and prayers commemorating the victims of the Holocaust and honoring the sacrifices of the men and women who helped liberate the victims of the Nazis at Auschwitz.

Steve Guest @SteveGuest
·
.@ScottJenningsKY: “In the run up to the Persian Gulf War, [Jimmy Carter] wrote letters, to all of our allies, and to Arab States, asking them to abandon their cooperation and coalition with the USA.. if it’s not treasonous, it’s borderline treasonous.” 🔥

11:18 PM · Dec 30, 2024

JENNINGS: In the run-up to the Persian Gulf War, he wrote letters to all of our allies and to Arab states, asking them to abandon their cooperation and coalition with the United States of America. If it's not treasonous, it's borderline treasonous, and so I hear what you're saying about the humanitarianism, but when you're an ex-president, and you have served in that office, I think you have a duty to the United States and only to the United States, and when he did that and other instances, to me, it showed that he cared more about his own legacy than he did about the country, and I think that is wrong. //

Scott Jennings @ScottJenningsKY
·
My thoughts on Jimmy Carter’s legacy last night on @cnn: terrible president, soundly rejected by the American people. Even worse ex-president, whose meddling in US foreign policy & virulent anti-Israel/anti-Semitic views must not be forgotten. Undermined US interests repeatedly.

6:58 AM · Dec 31, 2024
https://x.com/ScottJenningsKY/status/1874062472384307315

Ricardo Dale
4 hours ago
Carter handed us the current terror state that is Iran. Then he called Israel an "apartheid state." He is only partially redeemed by the fact that Joe Biden was worse by a large margin...