Daily Shaarli
September 23, 2024
Hardware hacker Dmitry Grinberg recently achieved what might sound impossible: booting Linux on the Intel 4004, the world's first commercial microprocessor. With just 2,300 transistors and an original clock speed of 740 kHz, the 1971 CPU is incredibly primitive by modern standards. And it's slow—it takes about 4.76 days for the Linux kernel to boot.
Initially designed for a Japanese calculator called the Busicom 141-PF, the 4-bit 4004 found limited use in commercial products of the 1970s before being superseded by more powerful Intel chips, such as the 8008 and 8080 that powered early personal computers—and then the 8086 and 8088 that launched the IBM PC era.
If you're skeptical that this feat is possible with a raw 4004, you're right: The 4004 itself is far too limited to run Linux directly. Instead, Grinberg created a solution that is equally impressive: an emulator that runs on the 4004 and emulates a MIPS R3000 processor—the architecture used in the DECstation 2100 workstation that Linux was originally ported to. This emulator, along with minimal hardware emulation, allows a stripped-down Debian Linux to boot to a command prompt.
Mildred's Oldest Son
3 hours ago
Of course he's incommunicado, he's probably afraid to turn on a table lamp, much less use any electronic devices. Tin cans and string have a limited range.
anon-eoij Mildred's Oldest Son
39 minutes ago
No more free hotel ball point pens… //
Noggindog
an hour ago
Oh, they shouldn't be talking about this! They should have just generated some deep-fakes of Sinwar saying and doing things Israeli's would like to see, things that discredit HAMAS. If he is still alive, he would have to surface! (giving Israel another shot at him!) And if he's dead, Israel could keep generating deep-fakes for quite a while!
ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể @TheThe1776
·
Megyn Kelly DESTROYS the lawfare against President Trump🔥🔥🔥‼️
11:16 AM · Sep 21, 2024
https://x.com/TheThe1776/status/1837511249321685004
Jason Calacanis asked about some of the cases, erroneously saying Trump had been found "guilty" in civil cases.
Kelly brought him up short, correcting him on the facts and the terminology.
His partners on the show also came back on him a bit, asking whether he knows Kelly is a lawyer,and said, "You said three convictions, now you're walking it back."
Then he asked if she thought all five cases had issues. "100 percent," she said.
That's when Kelly went to town. First, she noted the change of the law in the Carroll case. Next, she hit the problems in the fraud case brought in New York by Attorney General Letitia James, including that the banks didn't consider themselves victims and James ran on a promise of getting Trump.
She also snarked about how "Soros" Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg didn't like to bring any cases except against Donald Trump. There were questions there as well. Then she spoke about the Georgia case, where she referred to the relationship between Fulton County DA Fani Willis and Nathan Wade. Then she pointed out how the Florida classified documents case was likely to fall as well. //
David Limbaugh @DavidLimbaugh
·
I almost didn't watch this because usually when someone says another got schooled or whatever it's not that big a deal, but this is just delicious. Big props to @megynkelly for not only educating this clown, but humiliating him simply with the facts and unapologetic fierceness.
So now we understand the problem. RuntimeBroker.exe crashed (due to heap corruption, according to the call stack in the RuntimeBroker.exe crash dump, shown to the right) and it took more than 15 seconds to upload the crash dump, presumably due to my flaky hotel WiFi. During this time my start menu was inoperable.
This deserves reiterating. My start menu was hung due to the combination of heap corruption and WerFault.exe deciding that it needed to upload the crash dump before releasing the old process so that a new one could be started. //
Klaus Kjærgaard on January 18, 2023 at 7:19 am
I had some of the same issues – just with start menu being too slow. I disabled web search for start menu, and it works, is fast, only finds apps (and other local stuff; documents, folder, settings – but only when you navigate to that specified search target).
Bottomline – turning off web search in start menu = speed
regedit/use at own discretion:
HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\Explorer
“DisableSearchBoxSuggestions”=dword:00000001 //
Aaron Avery on January 18, 2023 at 11:56 am
Thanks for researching that, Bruce. It’s been quite a while since my start menu was that bad (or even non-functional). I landed on Keypirinha as my configurable third-party launcher of choice and it provides a much better experience for most things. Once in a while I’ll want some control panel (Settings) page that it refuses to find and I go back to the start menu for that. But having it index things like RDP machine names and Putty sessions saves time.
How many foot of water in 1 psi? The answer is 2.3066587368787. We assume you are converting between foot of water [4 °C] and pound/square inch.
- 1 foot of water to psi = 0.43353 psi
- 5 foot of water to psi = 2.16764 psi
- 10 foot of water to psi = 4.33528 psi
- 20 foot of water to psi = 8.67055 psi
- 30 foot of water to psi = 13.00583 psi
- 40 foot of water to psi = 17.3411 psi
- 50 foot of water to psi = 21.67638 psi
- 75 foot of water to psi = 32.51456 psi
- 100 foot of water to psi = 43.35275 psi
in the case of two films that highlight conservative subjects, the disconnect between the press and regular Americans is put on full display. The results show that either A) elitist “journalists” are totally out of touch with the greater public, or B) that they’re shaping the narrative to fit their progressive viewpoints, or C) both.
To wit, over at the movie review site Rotten Tomatoes, the film “REAGAN” received a terrible 17 percent “fresh” rating from professional reviewers—yet it garnered a huge 98 percent favorable rating from the public. That is an astounding divide. To me, it can only be explained by one thing: the left hates Ronald Reagan, and most journalists are left-leaning, so they can’t possibly judge a movie based on its merits. They can only judge it based on their ideology. //
Here’s some of the educated criticism from our nation’s journalists: “Like Reagan the actor and Reagan the president, Reagan the new movie has a strained relationship with reality.” Paul Renfro, Slate. No bias detected there, right? “It comes so close to parody that it brings to mind the ‘Saturday Night Live’ ‘Mastermind’ skit.” Rogerebert.com. “For conservatives, Reagan has become Muhammad, the Prophet whose name no non-believer ever dare utter.” Movie Nation. Wait, I thought you were reviewing a movie?
Trump War Room @TrumpWarRoom
·
Kamala says she'd "like another debate" with the "former vice president."
Does she think she's running against Mike Pence? Dick Cheney? Dan Quayle? Has she covered up Biden's cognitive decline for so long that it has now rubbed off on her?
6:30 PM · Sep 22, 2024 //
Brash Monk
2 hours ago
"The government is NOT supposed to be "providing" for me, it's supposed to get out of my way so I can provide for myself."
Spot on, well said.
A libertarian friend of mine once said to me that government has three jobs:
- Protect my borders.
- Deliver my mail.
- Stay the hell out of my business.
The current administration is failing at all three. Okay, I can give them credit for mail delivery, though I don't think they've done anything to help.
“On Friday, September 20, federal authorities executed search warrants at my residences. They took materials that came into my possession approximately 20 years ago and are unrelated to my work with the New York City Police Department,” the statement said. //
So what was Donlon doing 20 years ago? Working in counterterrorism for the FBI. //
Maximus Decimus Cassius
11 hours ago edited
One gets the sense that something rather significant is afoot. For now, we're left to wonder what exactly that might be.
If I may, the answer seems simple enough considering a possible Trump victory looming: Covering tracks, tying up loose ends, burying evidence and hiding proof of criminality. You know, typical FBI stuff. //
oldgimpy&cranky
11 hours ago
I would love to think this means the feebs are doing their proper job.
I have absolutely no faith, nor evidence that is the case and - at best - I suspect this is another "op" which is supposed to make us all swoon over the "Great, Good Work" the feebs have done for us.
Defund, downsize and move them out of DC.
Now, we will have to first download two plugins – DeDRM and KFX. The DeDRM can be downloaded from the following link, while the KFX plugin can be installed from the Calibre app itself (refer to step 4).
Step 5: Load Kindle books and remove DRM protections
- Now that all the plugins are installed, simply drag and drop the downloaded AZW3 files (under Documents > My Kindle Content) to your Calibre library.
- Calibre will automatically remove the DRM for these books. To be sure, click on Convert books at the top.
- Select an output format at the top right corner.
- And click OK.
- If your books are converted without any error messages, then you have safely removed the DRM from them. You can now save them wherever you like. To do so, right-click on a file and Save to disk.
- And select a folder.
- All your converted and DRM-free files will be in this folder.
It is ideal to get the latest version of Calibre to DeDRM books. But Calibre alone won’t be able to do so. You will need the DeDRM and KFX plugins as well to fully DeDRM your Kindle books.
Use a Kindle Paperwhite (v5), then open Amazon, manage digital purchases, and download and transfer book files. Save them to the PC, then drag and drop into Calibre.
When size and weight don't matter, lots of other battery chemistries can work.
The “sanctuary” term has most often been applied to immigration. But there are several different types of sanctuary cities – one of which is related to protecting Second Amendment rights. Indeed, over 61 percent of counties in America have declared themselves sanctuaries for gun rights. This means sheriffs and other local law enforcement would refuse to enforce unconstitutional restrictions on firearms coming from state and local governments.
An example would be what happened in Illinois when its government passed an assault weapons ban. Over half of the state’s sheriffs announced they would refuse to enforce the measure. While these counties did not necessarily declare themselves to be sanctuaries, the nullification principle was in action. //
Trump’s vow to end sanctuary cities will have more ramifications than he likely intends. Sure, it would make it easier to track down illegal immigrants – perhaps dangerous ones. But what is to keep a Democratic president from using this as a precedent to crack down on Second Amendment sanctuaries? //
This is why all politics is local. The governments that are closest to us should have the most say over what rules we choose to live under – not politicians in Washington, D.C. The last thing we want is for the federal government to be empowered to go after cities whose elected leaders uphold the Second Amendment – or other natural rights guaranteed in the Constitution. //
Anna DM
8 hours ago
I respectfully disagree. Illegal aliens are, well, illegal and so cutting off the funding to localities that endorse and support illegal activities is perfectly sane and rational. Gun ownership in the US is protected by the 2A. If some localities decide to disobey the 2A (placing unconstitutional prohibitions on the right to keep and bear arms) and then subunits within that locality decide to disobey the disobeying entity, that's not a sanctuary situation. That's a (very constitutional) middle finger to the entity that is disobeying the constitution. In the end, the courts generally overrule such unlawful incursions against the 2A. The two examples are not the same thing, IMO.
I say defund the sanctuary cities as regards illegal aliens. //
Terrible System
8 hours ago
2nd Amendment sanctuary cities are set up to protect clear 2nd Amendment rights. Immigration sanctuary cities are set up t0 abet violations of federal immigration law, which is clearly within the purview of the federal government to enforce.
There is no legitimate comparison here.
Here's a shot from the ABC News video at 2:00 minutes in. Check the second and third rows from the top. You see in the second row from the top, starting from the left, there are seven people. Those same seven people are then repeated in the third row, starting from the middle. //
So perhaps Harris or Oprah would like to explain what was going on here with the people being repeated? Did Harris not have enough people to fill out the spaces? //
anon-m6q6
7 hours ago
Cut and paste below in answer to every left-wing article. It drives the liberals crazy.
This election is not about choosing the most likeable person.
We are voting between two vastly different ideologies.
I'm voting for:
The First Amendment and freedom of speech.
Secure borders and LEGAL immigration.
Election integrity to include mandatory voter ID. (Why would anyone vote against this?)
The Second Amendment and my right to defend my life and my family.
The police to be respected once again.
Law & order and an end to allowing protesters to trespass and burn our cities, destroying innocent small business. (Tim Walz)
Personal responsibility and the end of the revolving door where criminals are being put back on the street. (Kamala Harris)
Supreme Court Justice(s) to protect the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
The Electoral College and for the Republic in which we live.
Continued appointment of Federal Judges who respect the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Keeping our jobs in America and not be outsourced all over the world to China, Mexico and other foreign countries.
Eliminating freebies given to all of the illegals and not looking after the needs of American citizens.
The military & the veterans who fought for this country.
Keeping men out of women's sports.
Peace in the Middle East.
Eliminating human/child trafficking.
Freedom of Religion.
The return of teaching math, history, and science instead of the indoctrination of our children.
I'm not just voting for one person.
I’m voting for Trump and the future of our country.